2016
DOI: 10.1080/00330124.2016.1208512
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voice Under Scrutiny: Feminist Methods, Anticolonial Responses, and New Methodological Tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter nonetheless holds enormous potential, for instance because of how it complicates well-intentioned attempts to give a voice to people whose perspectives are not captured in prevailing expert knowledge such as matatu drivers and boda boda clients (cf. Coddington, 2017) or because it promotes analysis strategies that ''unsettle'' in the sense of foregrounding and reworking the settler status of (western) scholars who want to ''go native'' (cf. Hallet, 2017).…”
Section: Wither Global Knowledge About Transport?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter nonetheless holds enormous potential, for instance because of how it complicates well-intentioned attempts to give a voice to people whose perspectives are not captured in prevailing expert knowledge such as matatu drivers and boda boda clients (cf. Coddington, 2017) or because it promotes analysis strategies that ''unsettle'' in the sense of foregrounding and reworking the settler status of (western) scholars who want to ''go native'' (cf. Hallet, 2017).…”
Section: Wither Global Knowledge About Transport?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carlson () argue that researchers must engage with anticolonial methodologies in order to enable indigenous ways of knowing and interpreting the experiences of colonized peoples on their own terms, evoking mainstream understanding and, further, disrupting structures of dispossession as well as colonial assumptions and templates. Further, Coddington () argues that paying attention to the colonial context of research pushes feminist researchers to produce work that is more complex, relevant, and nuanced as well as being more accountable to people's lives.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For some scholars, such as those working in border studies, conflict or settler colonialism, giving voice to the voiceless actors affected by state-controlled decisions is a crucial goal (e.g. Culcasi 2019; Dempsey 2020; Gentry et al 2019) -a theoretical and methodological impulse that again returns to a feminist ethic of research (Coddington 2017). For others, however, the constructivist lens on the state remains more loosely about understanding basic processes, like why it is that we still take such elusive concepts as the 'state' and the 'nation' for granted (Koch 2015b;Murphy 2013).…”
Section: The State As Socially Constructed and Genderedmentioning
confidence: 99%