“…The second advantage lies in the sampling used: the method by which the data were obtained, to be discussed below, allows for the analysis of: (1) a source of data that ties together, through readership and ongoing topical discourse, a much wider and interconnected body of evangelical boundary agents than small‐ N interviews and ethnographies would permit; and (2) the entire range of relevant articles from the EMQ and IJFM in a given time frame, thus allowing for results that, even if not necessarily representative of the entire American population of evangelical boundary agents, nevertheless reflect issues that are of clear importance to this community. In this way, this study avoids the occasional tendency of social science studies on missions to restrict themselves to extremely small, highly specific case studies (e.g., Arrington ; Berman ; Martin ; Wellman and Keyes ) or missionary populations that existed decades or even centuries ago (e.g., Bateman ; Martin ; Raymond ).…”