2013
DOI: 10.1002/jhbs.21607
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“Voices of the People”: Linguistic Research Among Germany's Prisoners of War During World War I

Abstract: This paper investigates the history of the Royal Prussian Phonographic Commission, a body that collected and archived linguistic, ethnographic, and anthropological data from prisoners-of-war (POWs) in Germany during World War I. Recent literature has analyzed the significance of this research for the rise of conservative physical anthropology. Taking a complementary approach, the essay charts new territory in seeking to understand how the prison-camp studies informed philology and linguistics specifically. I a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 31 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…39 As I have shown elsewhere, Lüders did not seem entirely convinced of the sonic scientific enterprise-despite his efforts (Hilden 2015). For him and many other Commission members, the sound recordings represented a by-product of the transliteration, which scholars continued to build their analyses on (Hennig 2016;Kaplan 2013;Meyer-Kalkus 2015). Moreover, Lüders' attitude and actions suggest that he had ethical concerns regarding the anthropometric studies of Felix von Luschan and his student Egon von Eickstedt (1892Eickstedt ( -1965.…”
Section: Lüders and Glasenappmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 As I have shown elsewhere, Lüders did not seem entirely convinced of the sonic scientific enterprise-despite his efforts (Hilden 2015). For him and many other Commission members, the sound recordings represented a by-product of the transliteration, which scholars continued to build their analyses on (Hennig 2016;Kaplan 2013;Meyer-Kalkus 2015). Moreover, Lüders' attitude and actions suggest that he had ethical concerns regarding the anthropometric studies of Felix von Luschan and his student Egon von Eickstedt (1892Eickstedt ( -1965.…”
Section: Lüders and Glasenappmentioning
confidence: 99%