“…We have seen, then, that in laryngeal phonological typology, standard forms of Dutch are classified as voice systems, due to phonetic voicing in their lenis obstruents and the lack of aspiration in their fortis counterparts -unlike most other Germanic languages such as Standard German, which is characterised by aspirated voiceless plosives for fortis and (variably) voiceless unaspirated (tenuis) for the lenis set. However, as Ouddeken (2016) points out, the transition zone of the Dutch-German dialect continuum in Europe comprises intermediate systems with a phonetic overlap between VOT values for fortis and lenis plosives. In this paper we claim that the situation Ouddeken sketches out bears a close resemblance to the present-day distribution of laryngeal systems in Britain brought about by historical changes and dialect contact: a number of regions in the far north of England, sandwiched between Scots (a voice language, as it will be recalled, with RVA) and mainstream varieties of English English spoken to the south (belonging to the type referred to above as GE, an aspiration language), have been reported to exhibit hybrid laryngeal systems that may lack aspiration and have partial, asymmetrical voice assimilation.…”