2016
DOI: 10.1515/amm-2016-0259
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voids Nucleation at Inclusions of Various Shapes in Front of the Crack in Plane Strain

Abstract: An analysis is presented of the stress field in and around inclusions of various shapes. Results were obtained by the finite element method. Inclusions were located within elementary cells located at the centre of the specimen next to the crack front. The influence of an in-plane constraint on the stress distribution was tested.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The number of the failed inclusions is a function of an effective plastic strain and such a relation was established experimentally. Detailed analysis of the stress fields around these inclusions were presented in papers [4] and [5]. The critical stress for TiN was estimated at the level of 1600 MPa and for MnS at the level of 1400 MPa.…”
Section: The Cellular Automata Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The number of the failed inclusions is a function of an effective plastic strain and such a relation was established experimentally. Detailed analysis of the stress fields around these inclusions were presented in papers [4] and [5]. The critical stress for TiN was estimated at the level of 1600 MPa and for MnS at the level of 1400 MPa.…”
Section: The Cellular Automata Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2b.) Next parameter, which was considered in the evolution receipts of the CA cells is the ratio of the stress level in a unite cell containing inclusion (weakened cell) and in a cell without inclusion [5]. It turns out that this parameter is not important one and the ratio does not depend on a shape of inclusion.…”
Section: The Cellular Automata Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%