1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(99)01401-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatile anesthetic inhibition of neuronal Ca channel currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

3
28
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
3
28
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The effect of VAs on [Ca 2 + ]i peak and plateau in neurons pretreated with both nicardipine and Ctx-GVIA, or the IBa in similarly treated voltage clamped GCs, showed marked inhibition of the remaining response, suggesting that P/Q-and Rtype VGCC are relatively sensitive to the VAs. After specifically blocking one or more of the various VGCC types, the VAs always had an effect on the remaining channels, consistent with our previous observation that the VA's inhibited the various types of VGCC to a similar extent when the specific associated α1 subunit was expressed in oocytes (α1Α =P/Q-type; α1B=N-type; α1C=L-type; α1E=R-type) (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The effect of VAs on [Ca 2 + ]i peak and plateau in neurons pretreated with both nicardipine and Ctx-GVIA, or the IBa in similarly treated voltage clamped GCs, showed marked inhibition of the remaining response, suggesting that P/Q-and Rtype VGCC are relatively sensitive to the VAs. After specifically blocking one or more of the various VGCC types, the VAs always had an effect on the remaining channels, consistent with our previous observation that the VA's inhibited the various types of VGCC to a similar extent when the specific associated α1 subunit was expressed in oocytes (α1Α =P/Q-type; α1B=N-type; α1C=L-type; α1E=R-type) (19).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Four distinct ion conducting α Ca channel subunits have been defined by molecular biologic techniques that correspond to these electrophysiological types: CaV1.2 (L-type, αC), CaV 2.1 (P and Q are splice variants, αA), CaV 2.2 (N-type, αB), and CaV 2.3 (R-type, αE) (18). We have previously demonstrated the ability of VA's to depress Ca 2+ currents through all four channels types when expressed in Xenopus oocytes (19). The present study was undertaken to determine to what extent VAs alter [Ca 2+ ]i transients in CG neurons mediated by these multiple types of VGCCs, and the resulting glutamate release evoked by the Ca 2+ entry.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drugs decrease the amplitude of both peak and residual (similar to "end current" here) Ca 2ϩ currents, shift Ca 2ϩ current inactivation to hyperpolarizing potentials, and increase the inactivation rate of native VSCCs in hippocampal (Study, 1994) and dorsal root ganglion neurons (Kameyama et al, 1999) as well as VSSC-expressed in oocytes (Kamatchi et al, 1999). One difference between the VOCs and volatile anesthetics is the ability of the former to shift the activation potential to more hyperpolarized potentials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alcohol and volatile anesthetics have been demonstrated to disrupt function of VSCCs (Study, 1994;Kamatchi et al, 1999;Kameyama et al, 1999;McMahon et al, 2000), and this action has been suggested to contribute to effects of these compounds on the nervous system. The present studies were designed to test further the hypothesis that VOCs interact with VSCCs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taken together, this suggests that the halothane-induced decrease in mEPSC and mIPSC frequency may be the result of a reduction in presynaptic calcium channel activity or by an interference with the calciumdependent proteins that mediate vesicular-membrane fusion. It was indeed shown that various types of voltage-gated calcium channels were inhibited by volatile anesthetics such as halothane and isoflurane and intravenous anesthetics such as propofol (Asahina et al, 1998;Nikonorov et al, 1998;Hirota et al, 1999;Kamatchi et al, 1999Kamatchi et al, , 2001Kameyama et al, 1999;McDowell et al, 1999;Camara et al, 2001;Hü neke et al, 2001;Yamakage and Namiki, 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%