2011
DOI: 10.1080/1331677x.2011.11517480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility Dynamics in an Emerging Economy: Case of Karachi Stock Exchange

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are consistent with those of Mehmud and Mirza [22], Waqar [23] who found EGARCH to be the best model for KSE 100 Index return series. Javid and Mubarik [25] however found out in their study that of all the asymmetric models used for KSE-100 Index, only EGARCH model had a negative leverage effect indicating that bad news decreased volatility and good news increased volatility.…”
Section: Asymmetric Modelssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results are consistent with those of Mehmud and Mirza [22], Waqar [23] who found EGARCH to be the best model for KSE 100 Index return series. Javid and Mubarik [25] however found out in their study that of all the asymmetric models used for KSE-100 Index, only EGARCH model had a negative leverage effect indicating that bad news decreased volatility and good news increased volatility.…”
Section: Asymmetric Modelssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Hameed et al [20], Mahreen and Nawazish [21] did modeling of conditional volatility of stock returns of the KSE-100 and found stock return volatility displays clustering and asymmetries. Mahmud and Mirza [22] used ARCH-type models in the Karachi Stock Exchange and concluded that the EGARCH (1, 1) captured the asymmetric effect efficiently during crisis. Waqar [23] confirmed that both EGARCH and TARCH models were best to capture the leverage (asymmetric) effect of KSE.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zafar, Urooj, and Durrani (2008) applied GARCH (1, 1) model on data set from 2002-2006. Mahmud and Mirza (2011) tested EGARCH model on the data from 2004 to 2009 i.e. before and after the financial crisis.…”
Section: Motivations For Asymmetry and Leverage Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Theoretically, this study adds to the existing literature in three different ways. Firstly, very limited literature is available that empirically investigates the relationship between macroeconomic factors and stock return volatility and its dynamics, particularly in the context of developing economies (Mahmud & Mirza, 2011;Qayyum & Anwar, 2011;Ho & Lyke, 2017). Hence, the current study addresses this deficiency.…”
Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ross, Dalton, and Sertyesilisik (2013), Chen, Chen, and Wei (2011), Gupta, Ye, and Saco (2013), Nazarko and Kononiuk (2013), Yazdani-Chamzini, Yakhchali, Volungevičienė, and Zavadskas (2012), Catik and Karacuka (2012), Mahmud and Mirza (2011) among other authors recently applied different mathematical models for forecasting of dynamics of the various phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%