2015
DOI: 10.2308/accr-51025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility Forecasting Using Financial Statement Information

Abstract: This paper examines whether financial statement information can predict future realized equity volatility incremental to market-based equity volatility forecasts. I use an analytical framework to identify accounting-based drivers of realized volatility. My main hypothesis is that accounting-based drivers can be used to forecast future realized volatility incremental to either past realized volatility or option-implied volatility. I confirm this empirically and document abnormal returns to an option-based tradi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, it appears that for each value perspective (price, return and volatility) there is a dominant model used by investors, for instance, investors tend to use the standard RIM for price valuation, DDM and DCF for return estimation, whereas, they use the market model for estimating equity volatility. This is consistent with LeRoy and Porter (1981), who questioned the ability of the accounting models to capture market volatility, but this might challenge the findings of Sridharan (2015), who argues that accounting-based volatility drivers may serve as useful indicators of the variance risk.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Furthermore, it appears that for each value perspective (price, return and volatility) there is a dominant model used by investors, for instance, investors tend to use the standard RIM for price valuation, DDM and DCF for return estimation, whereas, they use the market model for estimating equity volatility. This is consistent with LeRoy and Porter (1981), who questioned the ability of the accounting models to capture market volatility, but this might challenge the findings of Sridharan (2015), who argues that accounting-based volatility drivers may serve as useful indicators of the variance risk.…”
Section: Analysis and Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…The parentheses contain t ‐statistics based on standard errors clustered by firm and year. Columns 1, 2, 3, and 6 show the predictive power of RiskInfo 30$_{30}$ for changes in volatility is highly robust and incremental to standard controls known to explain variation in return volatility: firm size, the log book‐to‐market ratio, and the analyst‐based earnings surprise (e.g., Sridharan [2015]). These results further suggest that the risk information in earnings announcements is not fully captured by the earnings surprise itself.…”
Section: Data and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Previous studies in accounting, like Sridharan (), have used firm‐level accounting information to predict market trends and volatility. Our approach relies on firm‐level income statements and balance sheet information to identify economically relevant costs in a particular industry. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%