Managing Economic Volatility and Crises 2005
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511510755.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility, Income Distribution, and Poverty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Agenor 2001, Laursen et al 2004, Guillaumont 2006, Guillaumont and Korachais 2006. In most of these macro economic papers, reference is made to 6 the negative effects of shocks on households drawn from a large micro economic literature which emphasizes the direct effects of instability on poverty.…”
Section: The Negative Impact Of Instability Evidenced Both At the Macmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Agenor 2001, Laursen et al 2004, Guillaumont 2006, Guillaumont and Korachais 2006. In most of these macro economic papers, reference is made to 6 the negative effects of shocks on households drawn from a large micro economic literature which emphasizes the direct effects of instability on poverty.…”
Section: The Negative Impact Of Instability Evidenced Both At the Macmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies identify its effects on long-run growth (Ramey & Ramey, 1995), welfare (Pallage & Robe, 2003;Barlevy, 2004), as well as inequality and poverty (Gavin & Hausmann, 1998;Laursen & Mahajan, 2005). The question of what are the main determinants of macroeconomic volatility has thus attracted a great deal of attention in the literature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, 2004), and financial constraints and limited access to capital markets, which can limit discretionary policy during economic recessions (Kaminsky, Reinhart and Végh, 2004). If these outcomes result in a procyclical fiscal stance they are likely to amplify economic fluctuations, with adverse consequences, including for the volatility of government revenues (Eichengreen and Hausmann, 2004), poverty levels, especially in developing economies (World Bank, 2000; Laursen and Mahajan, 2005), and long‐term economic growth, by discouraging new investment (Bernanke, 1983), or by encouraging short‐term sub‐optimal investment (Serven, 1998), or by undermining human capital though unemployment (Martin and Rogers, 1997). In addition, if the reaction of fiscal policies to positive and negative cyclical conditions is asymmetric, procyclical fiscal policy can lead to adverse debt dynamics (Balassone and Francese, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%