1991
DOI: 10.2307/2328703
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility Increases Subsequent to NYSE and AMEX Stock Splits

Abstract: The post‐split increase in daily returns volatility is less for AMEX stocks than for NYSE stocks. The exchange trading location is a significant factor in explaining the volatility shift even after stock price and firm size are considered. Furthermore, when measured on a weekly basis, there is no increase in AMEX stocks' returns volatility. These results suggest that measurement errors created by bid‐ask spreads and the 1/8 effect, and also one or more of the elements that make the NYSE different from the AMEX… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0
3

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
27
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Lakonishok ve Vermaelen (1990), 1962-1986 yılları arasında hisse geri alım duyurularının pozitif piyasa hareketlerine sebep olduğunu belirlemişlerdir. Dubofsky (1991Dubofsky ( ), 1962Dubofsky ( -1987 döneminde hisse bölünmesi haberlerinin hisse oynaklığını arttır-dığını belirlemiştir. Chaney ve diğerleri (1991Chaney ve diğerleri ( ), 1975Chaney ve diğerleri ( -1984 arasında yeni ürün tanı-tımlarının yatırımcılara pozitif aşırı getiriler sağladığını belirlemişlerdir.…”
Section: Literatür çAlışmasıunclassified
“…Lakonishok ve Vermaelen (1990), 1962-1986 yılları arasında hisse geri alım duyurularının pozitif piyasa hareketlerine sebep olduğunu belirlemişlerdir. Dubofsky (1991Dubofsky ( ), 1962Dubofsky ( -1987 döneminde hisse bölünmesi haberlerinin hisse oynaklığını arttır-dığını belirlemiştir. Chaney ve diğerleri (1991Chaney ve diğerleri ( ), 1975Chaney ve diğerleri ( -1984 arasında yeni ürün tanı-tımlarının yatırımcılara pozitif aşırı getiriler sağladığını belirlemişlerdir.…”
Section: Literatür çAlışmasıunclassified
“…This inquiry closely follows the approach of Dubofsky (1991) and Clayton et al (2005) in that the dependent variable is defined as the natural logarithm of the pre-event and event window volatility ratio. The application of the log transformation to the variance quotient reduces the skewness of the underlying data and thereby leads to more reliable t-statistics.…”
Section: Repeat Steps I and Ii 5000 Times And Sort The Collectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the approach adopted in prior literature (Dubofsky, 1991;Clayton et al, 2005), we define the dependent variable as a natural logarithm of the volatility ratio. This ratio is constructed by dividing the return variance computed over the (-25,25) event window…”
Section: Determinants Of Election Surprisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stock splits were shown to increase volatility of stock returns (e.g. Sheikh (1989), Dubofsky (1991), Koski (1998) ) and mixed effects were also found on volume (Koski, 1998) and other measures of liquidity (Easley et al, 2001). Thus, even though the data is adjusted for capital events stocks experiencing splits during the observed period were excluded from the dataset 52 .…”
Section: International Journal Of Economic Sciencesmentioning
confidence: 99%