2017
DOI: 10.32468/be.983
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatility spillovers among global stock markets : measuring total and directional effects

Abstract: In this study we construct volatility spillover indexes for some of the major stock market indexes in the world. We use a DCC-GARCH framework for modelling the multivariate relationships of volatility among markets. Extending the framework of Diebold and Yilmaz [2012] we compute spillover indexes directly from the series of returns considering the time-variant structure of their covariance matrices. Our spillover indexes use daily stock market data of Australia, Canada, China, Germany, Japan, the United Kingdo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…0 Our results show that China is a net receiver (13.1%). This result goes in line with Gamba-Santamaria et al (2017b), who …nd that while the importance of China in international …nancial markets has increased over the last years, this country is still a net receptor of volatility from the world's major …nancial markets. Although results shown in Table 3 are interesting, as they present a snapshot of what happened in global markets for the whole sample period, they do not allow checking whether connectedness within markets changes over time.…”
Section: Data Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…0 Our results show that China is a net receiver (13.1%). This result goes in line with Gamba-Santamaria et al (2017b), who …nd that while the importance of China in international …nancial markets has increased over the last years, this country is still a net receptor of volatility from the world's major …nancial markets. Although results shown in Table 3 are interesting, as they present a snapshot of what happened in global markets for the whole sample period, they do not allow checking whether connectedness within markets changes over time.…”
Section: Data Descriptionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Total connectedness measures in related studies are lower than the one encountered in this study. See, for instance,Gamba-Santamaria et al (2017a, 2017b andZhang (2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%