1989
DOI: 10.1080/00102208908924018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volatilization and Burning of Pulverized Coal, with Radiation Heat Transfer Effects, in a Counter Flow Combustor

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…122 Results from numerical investigations indicated the presence of optimal pulverized coal particle size and flow conditions to attain maximum combustion efficiency. 123,124 A very recent work by Wen et al 125 explores the application of flamelet model in simulating coal combustion. The flamelet model as described in an earlier section can provide a significant computational advantage over conventional models.…”
Section: Addition Of Solid Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…122 Results from numerical investigations indicated the presence of optimal pulverized coal particle size and flow conditions to attain maximum combustion efficiency. 123,124 A very recent work by Wen et al 125 explores the application of flamelet model in simulating coal combustion. The flamelet model as described in an earlier section can provide a significant computational advantage over conventional models.…”
Section: Addition Of Solid Particlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of alternative improved combustors based on the opposed flow principle have been reported by Goldberg and Essenhigh (1978) and Goldman et al (1981). More recently, Hazanov et al (1985) and Greenberg et al (1989) described an opposed flow eombustor in which secondary and tertiary air are supplied in the final stage of combustion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the swirl-type or bluff-body combustors have not been run successfully for low-grade coals in unpreheated air in China (Fu, et al, 1986). Counter-flow (Greenberg and Goldman, 1990) or opposed-jet flame (Schaffer and Cambel, 1955) stabilizers were also developed, but they are not as practical as the swirler-type or bluff-body combustor and few applications were reported. Chen (1990) and Schefer (1989) had studied the similarities and differences between swirl-type and bluff-body combustors and between turbulent-jet and bluff-body combustors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%