2017
DOI: 10.1177/0033294117718555
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volitional Trust, Autonomy Satisfaction, and Engagement at Work

Abstract: This study tested a structural model that identifies the nature of relationships between trust, autonomy satisfaction, and personal engagement at work. A cross-sectional survey design with a convenience sample ( n = 252) was used. The Behavioral Trust Inventory, Work-Related Basic Need Satisfaction Scale, and Work Engagement Scale were administered. While reliance-based trust did not have a significant influence on engagement, disclosure-based trust in a focal leader was found to predict satisfaction of autono… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
15
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
5
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Concerning the relationship between the psychological resources and work engagement (H1), our results support the idea that a good appraisal of “psychological resources linked to the working environment” was a promoting factor in work engagement in terms of dedication, absorption, and vigor. These results are in line with current literature demonstrating that job resources (Bakker et al, 2007), social support (Saks and Gruman, 2018), and autonomy (Heyns and Rothmann, 2018), might positively affect levels of engagement. Contrary to our expectation (H2), the direct effect of work engagement on teaching practices was small and not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Concerning the relationship between the psychological resources and work engagement (H1), our results support the idea that a good appraisal of “psychological resources linked to the working environment” was a promoting factor in work engagement in terms of dedication, absorption, and vigor. These results are in line with current literature demonstrating that job resources (Bakker et al, 2007), social support (Saks and Gruman, 2018), and autonomy (Heyns and Rothmann, 2018), might positively affect levels of engagement. Contrary to our expectation (H2), the direct effect of work engagement on teaching practices was small and not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Various studies suggest that leadership is an important factor that positively contributes to work engagement, either directly or indirectly through other constructs (Coxen et al, 2016;Ebrahim, 2017;Harter et al, 2002;Heyns & Rothmann, 2018). Authentic leaders lead by example -they lead through their values and strive for truthful relationships (Gardner et al, 2005;Kernis, 2003).…”
Section: Work Engagementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the more distrust they have in the epistemic authority, the more dependence they have on external resources. Among adults, evidence shows that the more individuals trust the information provided by external sources (e.g., significant others, public leaders, policy makers), the more relatively autonomous predictions are made (60). According to expectancy-value models, this successful process increases both self-efficacy and hope (61).…”
Section: Trust In Epistemic Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%