2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2010.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltage-dependent calcium channel and NMDA receptor antagonists augment anticonvulsant effects of lithium chloride on pentylenetetrazole-induced clonic seizures in mice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the mood stabilizers studied here, topiramate and lamotrigine reduce glutamate functions by inhibiting glutamate receptors and glutamate release, respectively [52][54], which could explain their efficacy. Also treatment with lithium is known to indirectly affect NMDA-type glutamate receptor function, subunit expression and phosphorylation and activation of the related intracellular signalling cascades, such as phospholipase PLA 2 and nitric oxide (NO) pathways [55][58], while the NMDA receptor antagonists potentiate the actions of lithium [59]. However, other mechanisms than glutamate antagonism are likely to be involved also, since valproate is not known to antagonize the glutamate system, and indeed valproate has failed to protect from NMDA-induced seizures [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the mood stabilizers studied here, topiramate and lamotrigine reduce glutamate functions by inhibiting glutamate receptors and glutamate release, respectively [52][54], which could explain their efficacy. Also treatment with lithium is known to indirectly affect NMDA-type glutamate receptor function, subunit expression and phosphorylation and activation of the related intracellular signalling cascades, such as phospholipase PLA 2 and nitric oxide (NO) pathways [55][58], while the NMDA receptor antagonists potentiate the actions of lithium [59]. However, other mechanisms than glutamate antagonism are likely to be involved also, since valproate is not known to antagonize the glutamate system, and indeed valproate has failed to protect from NMDA-induced seizures [60].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, additional modifications of the titled compounds are needed to allow pharmacological investigations of their effects in the central nervous system, e.g., cognitive disorders, as there are considerable evidences that calcium is an important factor for the induction of epilepsy and calcium channel blockers, especially of 1,4-DHP with high lipophilic character, proved to be effective against the whole range of convulsive procedures including electro and Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) convulsions (Ghasemi et al, 2010;Shafiee et al, 2004). The latter pharmacological investigations are required to prove the potential of titled compounds as an adjuvant, non-sedative antiepileptic drugs, especially in those patients in whom conventional therapy has been inadequate or in patients who are refractory to anticonvulsant treatment, or in cases of untreatable epilepsy.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, different seizure-inducing agents or procedures cause a rapid intraneuronal influx of calcium ions, which is causally related to the subsequent epileptiform activity (Richard, 2005;Beig et al, 2009;Otoom and Hasan, 2006;Samzadeh-Kermani et al, 2009). Conversely, calcium channel blockers have proven to be effective against the whole range of convulsive procedures including electro and Pentylenetetrazole (PTZ) convulsions (Ghasemi et al, 2010;Shafiee et al, 2004) and sound and high pressure-induced seizures (NGouemo et al, 2010;Luszczki et al, 2008). Previous quantitative structureactivity relationship studies of asymmetric derivatives indicated that the vasodilative as well as the anticonvulsant potency of 1,4-DHPs was dependent upon lipophilic character of the aliphatic substituents located at 3-,4-and 5-position of 1,4-DHPs skeleton (Khoshneviszadeh et al, 2009;Miri et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The drastic clinical improvement obtained with lithium in our patient is particularly interesting. Indeed, unlike antipsychotics, lithium has no deleterious effect on epileptic threshold, and it has even been reported to be protective against seizures 11, 12, 13. It has shown clear efficacy on impulsivity and aggressiveness in a pediatric population 14, 15, 16.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%