8th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power. Proceedings (Cat. No.98EX227)
DOI: 10.1109/ichqp.1998.759974
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltage disturbance evaluation using the missing voltage technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the software-based peak voltage detector has demonstrated growing hardware performance. Since the introduction of the RMS method in [12], similar peak detectors have been released for power systems [1], [2], [8], [10]. For example, the compensation devices of voltage sag requires a peak detector and must respond in less than a quarter of cycle, or as fast as possible, which is difficult to accomplish.…”
Section: Conventional Peak Detector With All-pass Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the software-based peak voltage detector has demonstrated growing hardware performance. Since the introduction of the RMS method in [12], similar peak detectors have been released for power systems [1], [2], [8], [10]. For example, the compensation devices of voltage sag requires a peak detector and must respond in less than a quarter of cycle, or as fast as possible, which is difficult to accomplish.…”
Section: Conventional Peak Detector With All-pass Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of conventional peak detector methods have time delays, including the RMS method (2-9 ms) [12], the hybrid KF-RMS method (0.5-4 ms) [2], and DVR (2 ms) [11]. Other methods report a delay of 1-4 ms [1], with the maximum delay being generated around 0° or 180° for all methods.…”
Section: Proposed Fast Peak Detectormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RMS method has a time delay of 2-9 ms [5], the hybrid KF-RMS method has a time delay of 0.5-4 ms [6], and DVR has a 2 ms time delay [7]. Other methods report time delays ranging from 1-4 ms, with the maximum delay being generated at 0° or 180° for all methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous publications that have proposed voltage sag detection methods and they can be grouped as 1) synchronously rotating reference frame(SRRF)-based, or d-q transformation-based voltage sag detections [10][11][12], 2) instantaneous voltage technique-based or missing voltage-based voltage sag detections [13,14], 3) peak voltage evaluation-based voltage sag detections [15,16], 4) rms evaluation-based voltage sag detections [17,18], 5) time-frequency transformation-based voltage sag detections [19,20], 6) rectified voltage-based voltage sag detections [21] and 7) fractal-based voltage sag detections [22,23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%