2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.bcp.2020.113961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltage-induced structural modifications on M2 muscarinic receptor and their functional implications when interacting with the superagonist iperoxo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This property is strikingly reduced by high ACh concentrations (Fig 6B and 6C) due to the maximal activation of K ACh channels both at negative and positive potentials. These results are consistent with those obtained in feline cardiomyocytes with the superagonist iperoxo [34]. In the activation of the A 1 R-G i/o -I KACh pathway with Ado, the slight voltage dependence detected in the C-R curves (Fig 1 ) was not reflected in the relative affinity assessed by the current deactivation kinetics (Fig 2) [29,30]; and thus time-dependent changes of the current upon modifying the membrane voltage (relaxation) were not observed (Fig 3).…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This property is strikingly reduced by high ACh concentrations (Fig 6B and 6C) due to the maximal activation of K ACh channels both at negative and positive potentials. These results are consistent with those obtained in feline cardiomyocytes with the superagonist iperoxo [34]. In the activation of the A 1 R-G i/o -I KACh pathway with Ado, the slight voltage dependence detected in the C-R curves (Fig 1 ) was not reflected in the relative affinity assessed by the current deactivation kinetics (Fig 2) [29,30]; and thus time-dependent changes of the current upon modifying the membrane voltage (relaxation) were not observed (Fig 3).…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Alternatively, our data are more compatible with the idea that membrane potential induces conformational changes directly at the agonist binding (orthosteric) site of GPCRs, independent of G-protein coupling, which determine the modulation of the remainder signaling pathway [9,11,15,20,22]. Thus, regardless of the same effector of both cardiac signaling pathways, in M 2 R the hyperpolarizationinduced conformational changes (at the orthosteric site and the external access [34,37]) provoke an increase in the affinity for ACh [8,11,28] that yields a higher stimulation of downstream cellular elements. In A 1 R, it is conceivable that voltage also alters its molecular conformation but in such a manner that only a very slight change in the potency (probably the affinity) for Ado is generated (Fig 1), which is not mirrored in other less sensitive functional assays (deactivation kinetics and currents evoked with voltage step protocols).…”
Section: Plos Onesupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The depolarization-induced decrease in acetylcholine potency at the M 2 R has been related to a corresponding increase in acetylcholine k off at the M 2 R, and a consequent increase in GIRK response deactivation rate at depolarized potentials (Ben-Chaim et al, 2003;Ben Chaim et al, 2013;Agren et al, 2018b;Loṕez-Serrano et al, 2020). Similar findings have been reported for the mGluR3 and histamine H 3 receptors (Ohana et al, 2006;Sahlholm et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…A strong influence on ligand-specific voltage sensitivity of helices 3 and 6 was also reported for the muscarinic M3 receptor (Rinne et al, 2015). In general, there is still a lot of speculation about a possible general voltage sensing mechanism for GPCRs (Barchad-Avitzur et al, 2016;Hoppe et al, 2018;López-Serrano et al, 2020;Vickery et al, 2016). In this context, the involvement of a sodium ion bound to a conserved D was discussed (Vickery et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%