“…The relative standard deviation was measured at two levels of concentration mass of AA, i.e., 45 μg L −1 and 158 μg L −1 and calculated to be 4.2 % and 3.8%, respectively, values indicating the good reproducibility of the proposed assay. The linear detection region of AA in the present study is in several cases better than that determined by the corresponding electrochemical techniques in the literature [ 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 45 ] On the other hand, the detection limit of the current analytical AA detection methodology is better compared to the majority of those determined with the other corresponding electrochemical techniques available in the literature, with the exception that it is in the same magnitude of Zhao et 2019 [ 20 ], Kaçar and Erden 2020 [ 2 ], Broncová et al 2021 [ 34 ], Pekin et al [ 45 ], as it can be seen from Table 1 .…”