Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015) 2015
DOI: 10.18653/v1/s15-2043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voltron: A Hybrid System For Answer Validation Based On Lexical And Distance Features

Abstract: The purpose of this paper is to describe our submission to the SemEval-2015 Task 3 on Answer Selection in Community Question Answering. We participated in subtask A, where the systems had to classify community answers for a given question as definitely relevant, potentially useful, or irrelevant. For every question-answer pair in the training data we extract a vector with a variety of features. These vectors are then fed to a MaxEnt classifier for training. Given a question and an answer the trained classifier… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We build our system on top of the framework developed by our colleagues (Zamanov et al, 2015). In particular, we approach the task as a classification problem similarly to the approach we took for Se-mEval 2015 Task 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We build our system on top of the framework developed by our colleagues (Zamanov et al, 2015). In particular, we approach the task as a classification problem similarly to the approach we took for Se-mEval 2015 Task 3 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We build our preprocessing and feature extraction pipeline based on the system of Zamanov et al (2015), which was developed by a subset of our 2016 team for SemEval-2015 Task 3 on Answer Selection in Community Question Answering . The task in 2015 was to classify comments in a thread as relevant, potentially useful, or bad with respect to the thread question.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We compared our method against the JAIST [21] , HITSZ-ICRC [22] , QCRI [23] , ECNU [24] , ICRC-HIT [25] , VectorSlu [26] , Shiraz [27] , FBK-HLT [28] , Voltron [29] , and CICBUAPnlp [30] .…”
Section: Experimental Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%