1980
DOI: 10.2172/5282675
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume and accessibility of entrained (solution) methane in deep geopressured reservoirs - tertiary formations of the Texas Gulf Coast. Final report

Abstract: 38. Shale resistivity versus depth and bottom hole shut-in pressures in perforated zones of 13 wells, Kenedy County, Texas . . . . . . . 47 39. Correlation between ratio of normal and observed shale resistivities and pressure gradients in perforated zones of 13 wells, Kenedy County, Texas . 48 40. Shale resistivity, mud weight, temperature, and bottom hole shut-in pressure versus depth, Humble No. 23 S. K. East trB,rr

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 6 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Criteria for reliable Horner corrected BHTs include a minimum of three logging runs that record time and temperature for each run, and deviation from the least squares regression line that is less than the measurement uncertainty [i.e., ± 1-3 °C; [16]]. Other correction schemes that do not use mud circulation time and are typically empirical include the Förster Correction [19], the Harrison Correction [6], subsequently redefined by Blackwell et al [20], and Blackwell [21], and the Kehle Correction [22]. These correction schemes were used for correcting BHTs in the Denver Basin of Colorado and in Nebraska [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Criteria for reliable Horner corrected BHTs include a minimum of three logging runs that record time and temperature for each run, and deviation from the least squares regression line that is less than the measurement uncertainty [i.e., ± 1-3 °C; [16]]. Other correction schemes that do not use mud circulation time and are typically empirical include the Förster Correction [19], the Harrison Correction [6], subsequently redefined by Blackwell et al [20], and Blackwell [21], and the Kehle Correction [22]. These correction schemes were used for correcting BHTs in the Denver Basin of Colorado and in Nebraska [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%