1978
DOI: 10.1007/bf02026000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume changes and potential artifacts of epithelial cells of frog skin following impalement with microelectrodes filled with 3m KCl

Abstract: Cells of isolated frog skin epithelium were observed microscopically during impalement with standard microelectrodes of 5 to 20 Momega resistance, filled with 3 m KCl. Impaled cells, as well as some neighboring cells, were seen to swell 10 to 100 sec after impalement, while the negative potential recorded by the microelectrode depolarized (open circuit conditions). Apparently, osmotic swelling of small epithelial cells may be caused by diffusion of KCl from such electrodes. This conclusion is supported by calc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1979
1979
1991
1991

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…the transient hyperpolarization, represents potential changes (independent of the absolute values), which occurred while the microelectrode position was unchanged. Regarding the magnitude of micro-electrode tip artefacts, Nelson et al (1978) observed that under the worst conditions 'pre-tippotentials' after impalement were below 5 mV for microelectrodes with resistances above 20 MQ (as in the present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…the transient hyperpolarization, represents potential changes (independent of the absolute values), which occurred while the microelectrode position was unchanged. Regarding the magnitude of micro-electrode tip artefacts, Nelson et al (1978) observed that under the worst conditions 'pre-tippotentials' after impalement were below 5 mV for microelectrodes with resistances above 20 MQ (as in the present study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Microelectrode studies of small cells are subject to uncertainty because of the possibility of significant cell damage (Lindemann, 1975;Higgins, Gebler & Fr6mter, 1977), changes in intracellular ionic composition upon impalement (DeLong & Civan, 1978;Nelson, Ehrenfeld & Lindemann, 1978), or uncontrolled changes in electrode tip potential upon penetration of the cell membrane. Since it is difficult to exclude completely the possibility of artifacts, we considered it essential to validate our measurements by a variety of criteria.…”
Section: Justification and Validation Of The Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature has pointed out that there may be significant leakage of KCl from conventional micro-electrodes filled with 3 M-KCl (Nelson, Ehrenfeld & Lindemann, 1978;Fromm & Schultz, 1981;Blatt & Slayman, 1983). This leakage may be caused by electro-diffusion of KCl from the micro-electrode, and/or by the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid column in the electrode shank.…”
Section: Micro-electrode Fabrication Andsuction Impalement Techniquementioning
confidence: 99%