Not including the references 1-6 mentioned in the preceding comment 7 is regrettable. Nonetheless, those references do not necessarily support the view 7 that the SmA-N transition in 8CB and other liquid crystals 5,6 is, "without doubt", second order.In Table 1 of ref 8, the density at 33.56°C was incorrectly reported and should be 0.98916 g cm -3 , and least-squares fits of the density F(θ) versus θ in the smectic A "intermediate" and nematic phase regions, where θ ) t -t′, t is the temperature at which the density is measured, and t′ is a temperature at the center of each region, gave the best correlation coefficients (in excess of 0.997) for equations of the form Such correlation, even if for "apparent" densities, points to the likely existence of a third intermediate phase in the region where the viscosity variation with temperature is different from that in both the smectic A and nematic phases. The comment also refers to Figure 6 in ref 4, which shows that the densities for the smectic A phase of 8OCB obtained using an Anton Paar density meter are higher than those from more accurate density measurements. This does not rule out the possible existence of an intermediate phase extending over about 0.07 K 8 within the 1 K temperature range between the datum at the highest temperature in the smectic A phase and the datum at the lowest temperature in the nematic phase, where no data were collected.Impurities intentionally added or intrinsic to the synthesis or purification procedure affect the density of a liquid crystal, lower or raise the transition temperature, and bring about a two-phase region in the vicinity of a first-order transition. 9 Whereas a sharp "best" value of 307.0942 K is calculated by Ż ywociński and Wieczorek 6 for the SmA-N transition temperature T AN for 8CB, Oweimreen 9 obtained broad and sharp SmA-N and N-I transitions, respectively, from a heating cycle on an 8CB sample. The broadness of the SmA-N transition is attributable to the coexistence of smectic A and nematic phases or the existence of an intermediate phase in the immediate vicinity of the SmA-N transition. The densities in this region are neither for the smectic A phase nor for the nematic phase. The inclusion of data from such a region by Ż ywociński et al. 5 and Ż ywociński and Wieczorek 6 in their V(t) versus t fits, where t ) |(T -T AN )/ T AN |, to the equation in the nematic phase region (T > T AN ) and the equation in the smectic A phase region (T < T AN ) casts doubt on their conclusion that the SmA-N transition is second order on the basis of the smallness of the C -C′ values. A single fit using eq 2 (or eq 3) for all the data above and below T AN is possible if t is defined as T/T AN . If such a fit turns out to be statistically significantly inferior to the fits in the separate regions, such doubt would be confirmed. In the absence of published 5,6 numbers, only the following qualitative analysis is possible.The constructions added to Figure 1 of ref 6 for 8CB and shown in Figure 1 in this comment allow the reader to ...