1991
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910180206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume imaging with MR phased arrays

Abstract: A volume MR phased array was constructed with two coils placed anteriorly and two coils posteriorly. Data acquired simultaneously from the four coils on a phantom were combined into a single image having a signal-to-noise ratio 80% better than that from the body coil. Additional comparisons of the four-coil phased array with a two-coil phased array and a Helmholtz pair having the same overall dimensions show how variations of signal amplitude and phase in the individual coils affect the composite SNR. Images o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
108
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the net SNR is always highest for the largest number of elements, despite the fact that the smaller individual coils of the multielement arrays have markedly reduced individual SNR at the selected depth. This result is consistent with the predictions of superposition principles, which suggest that the loss of depth sensitivity by small individual elements will be compensated by an associated increase in the number of elements, provided that noise from individual coil circuits is kept under control (15)(16)(17)(18). As an illustration of the superposition argument, imagine that a single rectangular coil is divided into two coils each with half the total area.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Note that the net SNR is always highest for the largest number of elements, despite the fact that the smaller individual coils of the multielement arrays have markedly reduced individual SNR at the selected depth. This result is consistent with the predictions of superposition principles, which suggest that the loss of depth sensitivity by small individual elements will be compensated by an associated increase in the number of elements, provided that noise from individual coil circuits is kept under control (15)(16)(17)(18). As an illustration of the superposition argument, imagine that a single rectangular coil is divided into two coils each with half the total area.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…Two coils with different coil geometry were used: a commercially available four-coil spine array consisting of linearly arranged 100 mm square coils and a locally developed four-coil receive only head coil consisting of 300 mm square coils wrapped around a cylindrical former (13,14). In both cases the individual coils were geometrically isolated from nearest neighbors by overlapping and any coupling minimized further by low-impedance preamplifier circuitry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Present-day MRI relies strongly on signal detection with receiver arrays, which were first described in the late 1980s (1)(2)(3)(4) and analyzed in detail by Roemer et al (4). Initially, receiver arrays were devised and used to enhance the net signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) compared with single-coil acquisitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%