2016
DOI: 10.1039/c5mh00284b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume-invariant ionic liquid microbands as highly durable wearable biomedical sensors

Abstract: Non-volatile and flow properties of ionic liquids allow for simple ‘fill and seal’ approach to fabricate high-performance wearable sensors without materials delamination or cracking.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
119
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
119
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results indicate that conductivity of the D‐hydrogel was only provided by the Fe 3+ involved in the coordination of ions, while the conductivity of D‐hydrogel‐Li + was dependent on the interaction of Fe 3+ and free movement of the Li + , which not only improved the conductivity of hydrogels, but also increased the sensitivity of resistance. In addition, the relative resistance changes versus strains of the strain sensor can fit into a parabolic equation y = Ax 2 + Bx + C , where y is the relative resistance changes and x is the tensile strain . There is no relative resistance change when there is no strain applied to the sensor, so C is zero in the equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results indicate that conductivity of the D‐hydrogel was only provided by the Fe 3+ involved in the coordination of ions, while the conductivity of D‐hydrogel‐Li + was dependent on the interaction of Fe 3+ and free movement of the Li + , which not only improved the conductivity of hydrogels, but also increased the sensitivity of resistance. In addition, the relative resistance changes versus strains of the strain sensor can fit into a parabolic equation y = Ax 2 + Bx + C , where y is the relative resistance changes and x is the tensile strain . There is no relative resistance change when there is no strain applied to the sensor, so C is zero in the equation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be seen that Δ R / R 0 increases gradually with the increasing tensile strain; when stretched to 1700% strain, a 140% increase of resistance is acquired. The Δ R / R 0 versus strain could be well fitted into a parabolic equation: y=Ax2+Bx+C where y represents the Δ R / R 0 , x stands for the stretch strain and the value A can be applied as a factor for the sensitivity of the strain sensor . In normal conditions, although the metallic materials have a much higher sensitivity, they merely maintain very weak ductility (<5%) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the conventional mechanical crack‐based strain sensors based on disconnection–reconnection events of the crack edges demonstrated high GF than resistive ITS strain sensors, but most of them worked in a narrow strain regime (<10%) . On the other hand, resistive ITS show outstanding detection of a wide range of strains (0.1–500%) . These qualities make resistive ITS a suitable candidate for a wide range of applications including human‐interactive technologies.…”
Section: Transduction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among different ITS, transistor ITS exhibit high pressure sensitivity and possibility for large area integration, but the strain sensing feature is not realized in practice . Piezoresistive ITS can sense multiple external stimuli such as normal pressures, shear/torsional forces, and strain, but they exhibit low sensitivity, slow response, and considerable hysteresis . Supercapacitive ITS exhibit multimodal tactile sensing capabilities with high sensitivity and fast response with additional benefits of low voltage operation and large‐scale fabrication .…”
Section: Transduction Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%