1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0191-8141(98)00008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume loss and metasomatism during cleavage formation in carbonate rocks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Evidence presented here supports the hypothesis that these slip surfaces are controlled by a diffusion mass transfer where their development may depend on the mineralogy of the substrate host rock. Details of the mineralization will give clues about the active processes during slip, be they congruent or incongruent pressure solution (Fry, 1982), diffusion to pressure shadows which allow fiber growth (Durney and Ramsay, 1973), or outright transport in a fluid to some host elsewhere in the section (Davidson et al, 1998). If these surfaces are not a product of frictional wear, can they be incorporated in any model based on Coulomb wedge theory (Davis et al, 1983)?…”
Section: Foreland Detachment Within Gas Shalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Evidence presented here supports the hypothesis that these slip surfaces are controlled by a diffusion mass transfer where their development may depend on the mineralogy of the substrate host rock. Details of the mineralization will give clues about the active processes during slip, be they congruent or incongruent pressure solution (Fry, 1982), diffusion to pressure shadows which allow fiber growth (Durney and Ramsay, 1973), or outright transport in a fluid to some host elsewhere in the section (Davidson et al, 1998). If these surfaces are not a product of frictional wear, can they be incorporated in any model based on Coulomb wedge theory (Davis et al, 1983)?…”
Section: Foreland Detachment Within Gas Shalementioning
confidence: 99%