2010
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245814
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume Measurement of Liver Metastases Using Multidetector Computed Tomography: Comparison of Lesion Diameter and Volume segmentation – A Phantom Study

Abstract: Manual segmentation and the seed point method for thin CT slices were the methods with the lowest volume differences and intraobserver variation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12,17 Although CBCT does not have the objective calibration of the gray scale, because it does not provide Hounsfield units, 39 the reliability of CBCT in the assessment of osseous consolidation has been supported as a standard in histomorphometric references. 13 The method of digital segmentation used in the present study, which has been validated as the best approach, 40 was combined with the imaging elaboration software Amira (Visage Imaging GmbH) for complex anatomic structure 3D reconstruction, mainly owing to its ability to contemporarily visualize the 3 spatial planes when defining the outlines of the lesion. 41 The weaknesses of the present study included the reduced sample size, heterogeneity of the histologic types, and heterogeneity of the patient population.…”
Section: E8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12,17 Although CBCT does not have the objective calibration of the gray scale, because it does not provide Hounsfield units, 39 the reliability of CBCT in the assessment of osseous consolidation has been supported as a standard in histomorphometric references. 13 The method of digital segmentation used in the present study, which has been validated as the best approach, 40 was combined with the imaging elaboration software Amira (Visage Imaging GmbH) for complex anatomic structure 3D reconstruction, mainly owing to its ability to contemporarily visualize the 3 spatial planes when defining the outlines of the lesion. 41 The weaknesses of the present study included the reduced sample size, heterogeneity of the histologic types, and heterogeneity of the patient population.…”
Section: E8mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across observers, no such differences were observed in volumetric lesion size change measurements ( • " Table 2). Furthermore, the limits of agreement for manually measured lesion size changes were greater than specified in the RECIST 1.1 criteria and in the literature (this study: ± 48.8 %, RECIST -30 to + 20 %, de Hoop [22] 16.4 to 23.8 % for measured lesion size at zero lesion growth, Kostis [10] SD of 18.5 % to 7.47 % of lesion volume change in stable rated pulmonary nodules [15]), which is considered to be a limitation of this study. An increased inter-rater variability might be due to the study design of examining lesion size changes (i. e., variability at baseline and follow-up influences measured lesion Table 2) and deployment of radiologists with different levels of training.…”
mentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Heterogeneous treatment response, which can be seen in different types of primary cancers and systemic treatments, is not represented by RECIST1.1 [ 62 ]. Additionally, volumetric measurement methods show a higher intra-observer reproducibility compared to RECIST1.1 [ 63 ]. Quantification of total HTL in clinical routine is not routinely performed, and in most cases, tumor load is visually estimated by the radiologist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%