2018
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.98.022132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume of violation of Bell-type inequalities as a measure of nonlocality

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the higher chance of Bell inequality violation, we obtain a higher chance of achieving a non-zero key. This result also reverberates the results of the nonlocal volume 2 in [59][60][61][62][63][64], which increases for the pure bipartite entangled state when more measurement settings for each party are used. We observe the same phenomenon in our case, regarding the secret key rate.…”
Section: Random Measurement Settingssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…From the higher chance of Bell inequality violation, we obtain a higher chance of achieving a non-zero key. This result also reverberates the results of the nonlocal volume 2 in [59][60][61][62][63][64], which increases for the pure bipartite entangled state when more measurement settings for each party are used. We observe the same phenomenon in our case, regarding the secret key rate.…”
Section: Random Measurement Settingssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The highest violation strength is observed for inequalities belonging to family (5) in 99.1% of random sets of settings, (6) in 0.85%, (7) in 0.04% and (8) in 0.01%. This means that in almost all cases we effectively use only two out of five settings.…”
Section: Statistical Relevance Of Facet Inequalitiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The probability of violation of local realism under random measurements, proposed in [1], has gained considerable attention as an operational measure of nonclassicality of quantum states [2]. It has been demonstrated both numerically [3][4][5] and analytically [2,6] that this quantity is a good candidate for a nonlocality measure. What is more, in [6] it was proved that this quantifier satisfies some natural properties and expectations for an operational measure of nonclassicality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and have a clear experimental interpretation. For instance, in an experimental setup based on correlated photons each correlation coefficient can be expressed as a function of coincidence counts measured on the detectors [16].…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The probability of violation of local realism under random measurements, proposed in [12,13], has gained considerable attention as an operational measure of nonclassicality of quantum states [14]. It has been demonstrated both numerically [15][16][17][18] and analytically [14,19] that this quantity is a good candidate for a nonlocality measure. Furthermore, in [19] it was proved that this quantifier satisfies some natural properties and expectations for an operational measure of nonclassicality, e.g., invariance under local unitaries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%