2010
DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume–outcome analysis of colorectal cancer-related outcomes

Abstract: This study has confirmed the relevance of minimum volume standards for individual surgeons. Organization of services in high-volume units may improve survival in patients with rectal cancer.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

12
74
2
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 157 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
12
74
2
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Surgical technique might also be of concern, as there is a surprisingly high rate of leaks from the colonic anastomoses, amounting to about 10%. This may explain the postoperative mortality of 4.2% for all patients, which does not compare well to even population-based figures [19] .…”
Section: Commentary On Hot Articlesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Surgical technique might also be of concern, as there is a surprisingly high rate of leaks from the colonic anastomoses, amounting to about 10%. This may explain the postoperative mortality of 4.2% for all patients, which does not compare well to even population-based figures [19] .…”
Section: Commentary On Hot Articlesmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Many factors influence survival from colorectal cancer, including diagnosis or treatment centre (see Kee et al, (1999) on the influence of hospital and clinician workload; McArdle & Hole (2004) on volume and specialisation; and Borowski et al (2010) for a volume-outcome analysis), stage at diagnosis (see Woodman, Gibbs, Scott, Haboubi, & Collins (2001) on differences in stage at presentation; and Ciccolallo et al (2005) on the role of stage and surgery), and associated risk factors such as socioeconomic background, age at diagnosis and sex (see Morris et al (2011) for thirty-day postoperative mortality; Downing et al (2013) for early mortality; Smith et al (2006) on the impact of social deprivation; Widdison, Barnett, & Betambeau (2011) on age;and Hendifar et al (2009) on gender disparities). Findings exploring the potential impact of socioeconomic background (SEB) vary, with some studies showing an impact of poor SEB on decreased colorectal cancer survival (Downing et al, 2013;Morris et al, 2011), whilst others do not find this association (Nur et al, 2008;Smith et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A nastomotic leakage remains a feared and frequent complication in gastrointestinal surgery, especially for anastomoses on the colon and rectum, with leakage rates of 3% to 7% and 13%, respectively, [1][2][3][4][5] leading to a mortality rate of up to 27%. 1,6 In addition to existing interventions used to decrease the risk of anastomotic leakage, such as altered surgical techniques, preoperative optimization, and different postoperative regimens, anastomotic coating has been suggested as a potential method.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%