2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3093(02)01463-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volume recovery of polystyrene: evolution of the characteristic relaxation time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
34
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We choose this PS as the matrix material due to the presence of considerable data from previous dilatometric and calorimetric studies by Simon and coworkers. [33][34][35][36][37][38] A 10 wt % (equivalent to 4.2 vol %) silica/PS nanocomposite was prepared using the rapid precipitation method. 39 The colloidal silica was first diluted with MEK (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.7%) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We choose this PS as the matrix material due to the presence of considerable data from previous dilatometric and calorimetric studies by Simon and coworkers. [33][34][35][36][37][38] A 10 wt % (equivalent to 4.2 vol %) silica/PS nanocomposite was prepared using the rapid precipitation method. 39 The colloidal silica was first diluted with MEK (Sigma-Aldrich, 99.7%) at a concentration of 1 mg/mL.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in eq 2, the TNM model assumes an Arrhenius temperature dependence of relaxation time instead of generally accepted WilliamsLandell-Ferry (WLF)/Vogel-Tammann-Hess-Fulcher (VTHF) 52,53 dependence; however, for a limited temperature range around the nominal T g , the Arrhenius approximation is valid. 24,[43][44][45][46][47] In the TNM model, the evolution of the fictive temperature during a DSC heating scan after either cooling or isothermal aging is calculated by eq 3 as follows:…”
Section: Modeling Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to examining the kinetics associated with T g in these samples, the ToolNarayanswamy-Moynihan (TNM) model of structural recovery [40][41][42] is employed to allow the quantitative comparison and physical interpretation of the results. The TNM model is widely used to describe the glass transition kinetics of glassforming materials 24,[43][44][45][46][47] even though it is known to have shortcomings. 24,48 In this work, we will use it to help us quantify differences in the nonexponentiality and nonlinearity, by the parameters of b and x, in the ultrathin film and bulk samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 The TNM and similar phenomenological models have had broad success in describing many aspects of structural relaxation in amorphous materials, although their inadequacies have also been well documented. 40,41,51,[55][56][57][58] In the case of the XPCS experiments performed here, the failure of the TNM model is essentially due to the basic assumption that τ depends on the instantaneous state of the material via Tf. This is an over-simplification as it considers that a given glassy configuration can be defined by a single parameter like Tf or some macroscopic variable like specific volume or enthalpy and does not explicitly incorporate any microscopic details of the system under investigation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%