2023
DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000002724
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric Analysis of Spheno-Orbital Meningiomas: Prognostic Correlation and a Compartmentalized Approach

Youssef M. Zohdy,
Fadi Jacob,
Matthew Agam
et al.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Spheno-orbital meningiomas arise from the arachnoid villi cap cells at the sphenoid ridge and have the ability to spread through soft tissue extension and cranial bone invasion. Owing to their orbital hyperostosis and intraorbital soft tissue extension, they commonly present with ophthalmologic manifestations. This study aims to investigate the correlation between tumor volume with the presenting symptoms and postoperative outcomes. METHO… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the parenchymatous tumor can exhibit two patterns of growth: en-plaque (or flat), a thin carpet-like soft tissue growth at the dura mater, and globous (or round) with intradural growth. The hard consistency of the hyperostotic bone tissue of the lateral wall, as well as of the roof of the orbit, is the main cause for proptosis [ 5 , 18 , 19 ], which represents the main presenting symptoms of SOMs [ 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and which usually is unilateral, non-pulsating, irreducible, and slow evolving. Despite some authors also hypothesizing periorbital tumor invasion, intraorbital tumor, and venous stasis from the compression of the ophthalmic vein as other causes of proptosis [ 21 ], the hyperostosis–proptosis correlation as a cause–effect is further supported by the significant correlation between intraosseous tumor volume resected and proptosis improvement, with success rates ranging from 50 to 100% [ 9 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally, the parenchymatous tumor can exhibit two patterns of growth: en-plaque (or flat), a thin carpet-like soft tissue growth at the dura mater, and globous (or round) with intradural growth. The hard consistency of the hyperostotic bone tissue of the lateral wall, as well as of the roof of the orbit, is the main cause for proptosis [ 5 , 18 , 19 ], which represents the main presenting symptoms of SOMs [ 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and which usually is unilateral, non-pulsating, irreducible, and slow evolving. Despite some authors also hypothesizing periorbital tumor invasion, intraorbital tumor, and venous stasis from the compression of the ophthalmic vein as other causes of proptosis [ 21 ], the hyperostosis–proptosis correlation as a cause–effect is further supported by the significant correlation between intraosseous tumor volume resected and proptosis improvement, with success rates ranging from 50 to 100% [ 9 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard consistency of the hyperostotic bone tissue of the lateral wall, as well as of the roof of the orbit, is the main cause for proptosis [ 5 , 18 , 19 ], which represents the main presenting symptoms of SOMs [ 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 ], and which usually is unilateral, non-pulsating, irreducible, and slow evolving. Despite some authors also hypothesizing periorbital tumor invasion, intraorbital tumor, and venous stasis from the compression of the ophthalmic vein as other causes of proptosis [ 21 ], the hyperostosis–proptosis correlation as a cause–effect is further supported by the significant correlation between intraosseous tumor volume resected and proptosis improvement, with success rates ranging from 50 to 100% [ 9 , 19 , 22 , 23 , 24 ]. The involvement of the optic canal by hyperostosis, as well as by parenchymatous tumor invasion, accounts for the second most common presenting symptom of SOMs, i.e., visual acuity deficit [ 9 , 23 , 25 , 26 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%