Volumetric and Functional Evaluation of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle after Augmentation Gluteoplasty Using Silicone Implants

Serra, Fernando; Aboudib, José Horácio; Neto, José Inácio Salles; Cossich, Victor Rodrigues Amaral; Rodrigues, Nádia Cristina Pinheiro; Oliveira, Katia Fuhro de; Marques, Ruy Garcia

doi:10.1097/prs.0000000000000970

Cited by 18 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 50 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Details are listed in Appendix A. Five techniques of gluteal augmentation were identified: gluteal augmentation with implants (n = 4781), 1,2,7,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30] autologous fat grafting (n = 2609), 21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47] local flaps (n = 369), [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56] hyaluronic acid gel injection (n = 69),…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Finally, despite the high rate of complications, gluteal augmentation with implants was also associated with high satisfaction of patients and surgeons by the authors who included this aspect in their investigations, which also reported improved body image and confidence. 7,[12][13][14][15]17,[19][20][21][23][24][25][26][27][28]…”

Section: Gluteal Augmentation With Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Gluteal Augmentation Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Oranges

Tremp

Summa

et al. 2017

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Many studies of gluteal augmentation techniques have been published in recent decades, including case reports, retrospective and prospective case series, and multicenter survey reviews. However, to date, there has been no study of the overall complications or satisfaction rates associated with the broad spectrum of techniques. Objectives: The authors performed a comprehensive literature review to determine outcomes and complications of gluteoplasty techniques, including patient satisfaction. Methods: A search on PubMed/Medline was performed for clinical studies involving gluteal augmentation techniques. A priori criteria were used to review the resulting articles. Results: Fifty-two studies, published from 1969 through 2015, were included -representing 7834 treated patients. Five gluteal augmentation techniques were identified from these studies: gluteal augmentation with implants (n = 4781), autologous fat grafting (n = 2609), local flaps (n = 369), hyaluronic acid gel injection (n = 69), and local tissue rearrangement (n = 6). The overall complication rates of the most commonly utilized techniques were: 30.5% for gluteal augmentation with implants, 10.5% for autologous fat grafting, and 22% for local flaps. Patients' satisfaction was reported as consistently high for all the five techniques. Conclusions: Implant-based gluteal augmentation is associated with high patients' satisfaction despite a high complication rate, while autologous

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Gluteal Augmentation With Implantsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Gluteal Augmentation Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Oranges

Tremp

Summa

et al. 2017

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The surgical technique involved closure and separation of the buttock pockets in four planes, with satisfactory postoperative results and no recurrence. No similar case was found in our literature review [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 89%

“…The present case report describes a rare complication of gluteal augmentation with solid silicone implants, in which the implant was displaced from one gluteal pocket to the other. Displacement and rotation of the implant within a gluteal pocket has been reported in 0.59% of cases [6][7][8], but no reports in the literature describe a case in which two gluteal implants were lo-cated in a single pocket secondary to displacement; therefore, this case report makes a novel contribution.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A rare case of implant displacement to the contralateral side after gluteal augmentation

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this report, we present a rare case of solid silicone implant displacement to the contralateral side after aesthetic gluteal augmentation, a phenomenon that has never been reported before in the literature. A 29-year-old woman with a history of gluteal augmentation 9 months previously and soft tissue infection presented for a consultation due to 3 days of sudden progressive pain in the right gluteus with erythema and edema, without a history of trauma. Displacement of the left gluteal implant to the right gluteal pocket was shown by magnetic resonance imaging. Because the patient refused implant removal, the decision was made to perform capsulotomy, to reconstruct the gluteal pockets, and to preserve the implants. The patient showed a satisfactory early and late postoperative course. Possible causes of this complication include poor surgical technique, with insufficient tissue preservation to keep the pockets apart, and the presence of seroma or hematoma that favored an infectious process, thereby leading to deterioration of the dissected soft tissues with dehiscence of the wound favoring the displacement of the implant.

show abstract

“…Es necesario el seguimiento a más largo plazo para poder determinar el resultado alejado de la técnica. Ha sido reportado atrofia de la porción superficial del MGM luego de su bipartición, la cual no afecta la función del músculo a largo plazo 22 .…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Gluteoplastía de aumento con implantes de silicona con técnica XYZ. Serie de casos

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Augmentation gluteoplasty with silicone implants with XYZ technique Objective: Describing the clinical features, demographics features, outcomes and complications from a serie of patients underwent buttock augmentation with silicone implants with XYZ technique. Material and Methods: Retrospective case series of patients underwent buttock augmentation with intramuscular technique. It Is described the surgical technique, demographics data, comorbidities and post operative complications. Results: Since December 2014 to June 2017 were operated 19 patients. The most frecuent complication was wound dehiscence, it was present in 5 patients. One patient had a postoperative hematoma. Two patients presented seroma. One patient presented implant rotation. One patient left controls after removal the suture in the sixth week. None of patients needed revisional procedures. None of patients presented wound infection. None of patients presented extrusión or implant removal. Discussion: The XYZ technique is a efective method to aesthetic and reconstructive treatment of buttock area, especially in patientes without a suficient donor area to fat graft. The complications described are accord with literatura, that is why buttock augmentation with intramuscular silicone implant is recomended as a reproducible and safe technique.

show abstract

Volumetric and Functional Evaluation of the Gluteus Maximus Muscle after Augmentation Gluteoplasty Using Silicone Implants

Abstract: Therapeutic, II.

Cited by 18 publications

References 50 publications

Gluteal Augmentation Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review

Gluteal Augmentation Techniques: A Comprehensive Literature Review

A rare case of implant displacement to the contralateral side after gluteal augmentation

Gluteoplastía de aumento con implantes de silicona con técnica XYZ. Serie de casos

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About