2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00276-017-1949-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric assessment of sphenoid sinuses through segmentation on CT scan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

10
26
1
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
10
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The average volume of the SS at the ages of 5 years and 15 years were 1.52 ± 1.60 cm 3 and 11.83 ± 3.48 cm 3 for males and 1.25 ± 1.37 cm 3 and 5.92 ± 3.89 cm 3 for females, respectively. The average volume of the SS at the age of 15 years was nearly consistent with the adult measurements, as reported in previous studies [ 12 , 15 ]. Most previous studies measured the size and volume of the SS in cross-sectional samples [ 12 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The average volume of the SS at the ages of 5 years and 15 years were 1.52 ± 1.60 cm 3 and 11.83 ± 3.48 cm 3 for males and 1.25 ± 1.37 cm 3 and 5.92 ± 3.89 cm 3 for females, respectively. The average volume of the SS at the age of 15 years was nearly consistent with the adult measurements, as reported in previous studies [ 12 , 15 ]. Most previous studies measured the size and volume of the SS in cross-sectional samples [ 12 , 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The average volume of the SS at the age of 15 years was nearly consistent with the adult measurements, as reported in previous studies [ 12 , 15 ]. Most previous studies measured the size and volume of the SS in cross-sectional samples [ 12 , 15 ]. To our knowledge, this is the first study to longitudinally investigate the morphometric features of the SS during growth.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The present study demonstrated that the results of SAS were not accurate for complex structures and for the boundary between air and the thin bone in the nasal cavity. Lentzen et al reported that the sphenoid sinus volume could be measured accurately and conveniently using SAS with MS correction, which was similar to the SSMA method proposed in this study ( 27 , 28 ). However, the procedure used for SSMA was simpler compared to the other reported methods; SSMA was found to be highly practical, efficient, and accurate in the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…2,11,[16][17][18][19] Anatomy of SS is influenced by many factors, such as age, sex, and ethnicity. [5][6][7][8]12,20 In contrast, for what concerns ST, congenital and acquired conditions have proved to be of influence on sellar size: Canigur Bavbek et al 15 found that patients with type I diabetes mellitus have generally smaller sellar dimensions; Diri et al 21 showed that the volume of the ST of patients with Sheehan syndrome was smaller than in reference groups; Axelsson et al 22 demonstrated the presence of shorter sellar dimensions in subjects with Williams syndrome and Korayem et al 23 found greater values for AP diameter and sellar depth in patients with Down syndrome.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[2][3][4] A deep anatomic knowledge of SS and sella turcica (ST) is therefore essential to improve the outcome of endoscopic transsphenoidal surgeries. In the last decades the number of anatomic and morphologic research on SS has progressively increased [5][6][7][8] due to the growing application of the transnasal transsphenoidal procedures as a mean for treatment of skull base lesions. For instance, a lot of interest has recently been laid on the metric characteristics of the ST, whose morphology and dimension can be influenced by many factors, such as sex, ethnicity, and age.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%