1955
DOI: 10.1007/bf00443294
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Volumetric estimation of uranium ? Part II with sodium vanadate as reagent

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1956
1956
2000
2000

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 0.1 mol dm Ϫ3 solution of iron(II) and 0.5 mol dm Ϫ3 solution of sodium vanadate was prepared and standardized using the literature [11,12] methods. Salicylic acid (0.1 mol dm Ϫ3 ) was prepared and standardized bromometrically [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A 0.1 mol dm Ϫ3 solution of iron(II) and 0.5 mol dm Ϫ3 solution of sodium vanadate was prepared and standardized using the literature [11,12] methods. Salicylic acid (0.1 mol dm Ϫ3 ) was prepared and standardized bromometrically [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1), showing that k 1 I path is also absent. FeOH ϩ is the preferred reducing species because hydroxylated iron(II), being less positively charged than Fe 2ϩ , is not only a more powerful reductant because of greater nucleophilicity but also the entropy of activation (given approximately by Ϫ10 Z A Z B ) [12] is more positive. These interesting kinetic features observed due to equilibrium between the reactive species VO 2 ϩ and the unreactive decavanadate species are radically different from those observed for this reaction [16] In the present investigation, much lower acidities have been employed and the participation of FeOH ϩ as the active reducing species is more probable.…”
Section: Oxidation In the Absence Of Salicylic Acidmentioning
confidence: 99%