1995
DOI: 10.1016/0966-6362(95)90804-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voluntary and involuntary adaptation of walking to temporal and spatial constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
62
1
2

Year Published

1997
1997
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
62
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Results have shown also that smaller point estimate of relative phase in TW can be ascribed to significantly earlier occurrence of maximum backward rotation of the thigh. Since the end of the stance phase corresponds approximately to the instant of maximum backward rotation of the thigh and a shortening of the stance phase is associated to an increase of cadence (see Larsson et al 1980;Zijlstra et al 1995), the closer counter-phase oscillations of ipsilateral limbs observed in TW compared to OW, appears to be mainly related to a relative upscaling of the stride frequency which typically occurs when walking on a moving belt. This interpretation is enforced by the fact that a reduced point estimate of relative phase was found also in the subgroup of subjects (SW1) showing one oscillation per stride in both OW and TW, thus excluding the hypothesis that smaller point estimate of relative phase could be due to the lower incidence of 2:1 frequency coupling in slow treadmill walking.…”
Section: Different Inter-limb Relative Phase In Tw and Owmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Results have shown also that smaller point estimate of relative phase in TW can be ascribed to significantly earlier occurrence of maximum backward rotation of the thigh. Since the end of the stance phase corresponds approximately to the instant of maximum backward rotation of the thigh and a shortening of the stance phase is associated to an increase of cadence (see Larsson et al 1980;Zijlstra et al 1995), the closer counter-phase oscillations of ipsilateral limbs observed in TW compared to OW, appears to be mainly related to a relative upscaling of the stride frequency which typically occurs when walking on a moving belt. This interpretation is enforced by the fact that a reduced point estimate of relative phase was found also in the subgroup of subjects (SW1) showing one oscillation per stride in both OW and TW, thus excluding the hypothesis that smaller point estimate of relative phase could be due to the lower incidence of 2:1 frequency coupling in slow treadmill walking.…”
Section: Different Inter-limb Relative Phase In Tw and Owmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some typical examples are the use of conducting foot switches [1], pressure-sensitive foot switches [2 Á/4], ground reaction forces (GRFs) [5,6], or the analysis of foot displacement patterns [7,8]. However, these methods are often impractical or even impossible to use when gait is studied under real-life conditions, e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gait with reduced step length results in spending a proportionally longer time in the relatively stable periods of double-support and less in the more unstable single-support phase of the gait cycle (e.g. see Zijlstra et al 1995Zijlstra et al , 1998.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%