Voluntary Intake, Gain, Digestibility, Rate of Passage and Gastrointestinal Tract Fill in Tropical and Temperate Breeds of Sheep

Abstract

In trial 1, Coastal bermudagrass pellets were fed for 63 d to 21 growing rams of Barbados Blackbelly (B), Dorset (D) and Blackbelly X Dorset (B X D) breeding to determine the effect of breed on voluntary intake (VI) and total gain. Initially, each breed group consisted of seven rams with mean weights of 18.6, 31.0 and 26.4 kg, respectively. At the end of the intake and growth phase, digestibility, rate of passage and gastrointestinal tract (GIT) fill were determined. Chromium-mordanted fiber was used as a particle phase marker. Intakes during the digestibility-marker phase averaged 75% of the VI determined in the intake and growth phase. Breeds did not differ in VI, total gain or digestibilities of dry matter (DM) and neutral detergent fiber (NDF). Apparent crude protein (CP) digestibility was approximately 3 percentage units higher (P less than .10) for B X D than for B or D rams. Rate of passage was faster (P less than .05) for B X D rams than for the other breed groups, while D rams were intermediate. Total mean retention time (MRT) was shorter (P less than .05) for B X D rams compared with the other breed groups. Ruminal retention time (RRT) was shorter (P less than .05) and GIT fill was less (P less than .10) for D and B X D than for B rams. In trial 2, chopped orchardgrass-alfalfa hay was fed for 26 d to 19 of the same rams used in trial 1. Breed, number of rams and initial weights (kg) were: B, 5, 25.6; D, 7, 39.4; B X D, 7, 35.0.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Estimation of dry‐matter intake in lambs via field‐based NIR proximal sensing

“…In regard to (a), we carefully checked protocols, data and calculations and found no problems with the experimental design, data collection procedures or errors in the calculations of DMI Lamb . Additionally, our values of DMI Lamb were consistent with those reported by Mann, Goode, and Pond () and Pasha, Prigge, Russell, and Bryan (). As to (b), it should be observed that both the DMI equations used herein are empirically based and may not reflect our experimental conditions.…”

Genotype differences and their impact on digestive tract function of ruminants: a review

“…The within-breed differences in digesta RRT observed by Smuts et al . (1995) have also been matched by between-breed differences in RRT of sheep in some (Mann et al . 1987) but not all studies (Ranilla et al .…”

A comparison of voluntary intake and in vivo digestion in guanacos (Lama guanicoe) and sheep given fresh grass

“…For example, the daily intakes of the sheep during the current trials ranged from 17 to 19 g/kg live weight, much less than the corresponding figure of 23 g/kg live weight cited in the review by San Martin and Bryant (1989). Such discrepancies, together with reports of significant differences in intake between different breeds of sheep (Mann et al, 1987;Iason et al, 1994) indicate that care must be taken when extrapolating from this type of comparative study. Such discrepancies, together with reports of significant differences in intake between different breeds of sheep (Mann et al, 1987;Iason et al, 1994) indicate that care must be taken when extrapolating from this type of comparative study.…”