2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2008.10.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Von Frey's hairs – a review of their technology and use – a novel automated von Frey device for improved testing for hyperalgesia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
5

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
38
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The centre of each cutaneous RF was stimulated mechanically with an automated von Frey device, as previously described (26). Intermittent single von Frey stimuli were applied by activating the device from a stimulator which was in turn driven by the data-acquisition software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The centre of each cutaneous RF was stimulated mechanically with an automated von Frey device, as previously described (26). Intermittent single von Frey stimuli were applied by activating the device from a stimulator which was in turn driven by the data-acquisition software.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17 Von-frey monofilamentler: Yumuşak fırça darbeleriyle hastanın temas algısını ölçmede kullanılırlar. 18 Pinprick testi: 22 veya 23 gauge iğne ile ağrıya cevap ölçülür. 19 Termal test: Radyan ısı kaynağı veya etil kloritli pamuk parçası, mümkün olduğunca çabuk deriye değdirilir ve tepki ölçülür.…”
Section: Klinik Hassasiyet Testleriunclassified
“…However, determining the sensitivity of the orofacial regions of a rodent can be difficult using some common methods. As an example, fixed stimulus and investigator driven devices can be used to determine tolerance thresholds in the orofacial region based on animal reaction to stimuli (Imamura et al, 1997; Krzyzanowska et al, 2011; Morris et al, 1982; Rosenfeld et al, 1978; Vos and Strassman, 1994); however, variations in reaction scoring criteria between experimenters, animal stress due to handling and restraint, and differences in protocols can limit the sensitivity of these methods and confound the results (Chesler et al, 2002; Hogan et al, 2004; Lambert et al, 2009). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%