2002
DOI: 10.1002/cpa.3018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex dynamics of the full time‐dependent Ginzburg‐Landau equations

Abstract: In the Ginzburg-Landau model for superconductivity, a large Ginzburg-Landau parameter κ corresponds to the formation of tight, stable vortices. These vortices are located exactly where an applied magnetic field pierces the superconducting bulk, and each vortex induces a quantized supercurrent about the vortex. The energy of large-κ solutions blows up near each vortex, which brings about difficulties in analysis. Rigorous asymptotic static theory has previously established the existence of a finite number of th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although (1) provides a fertile ground to test the mathematics of the Gorkov-Eliashberg equations, the more physical problem entails looking at the hydrodynamic limit of (4). For the Gorkov-Eliashberg equations (4), corresponding proofs of the vortex motion law are due to the second author [49] for O(1) fields and Sandier and Serfaty [41] for larger fields, following the formal asymptotic work of [38]. Formally, it was shown by Chapman, Rubinstein, and Schatzman [7] that the hydrodynamic limit of the associated ODE arising from the vortex motion law of (4) converges to a weak solution of…”
Section: Results In the Following We Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although (1) provides a fertile ground to test the mathematics of the Gorkov-Eliashberg equations, the more physical problem entails looking at the hydrodynamic limit of (4). For the Gorkov-Eliashberg equations (4), corresponding proofs of the vortex motion law are due to the second author [49] for O(1) fields and Sandier and Serfaty [41] for larger fields, following the formal asymptotic work of [38]. Formally, it was shown by Chapman, Rubinstein, and Schatzman [7] that the hydrodynamic limit of the associated ODE arising from the vortex motion law of (4) converges to a weak solution of…”
Section: Results In the Following We Letmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statement ii) in Proposition 1 was already proved in [11,12,16,18] in the case of "wellprepared" initial data, i.e. having l vortices of degree +1 and −1 and an energy E ε (u 0 ε ) = π|log ε| + O(1): this is actually the minimal energy required for such a vortex configuration.…”
Section: Proposition 1 I)mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…the gradient-flow of (1), for large applied fields (the result for bounded applied fields had been obtained by Spirn [52]). …”
Section: Dynamical Law For Ginzburg-landau With Magnetic Fieldmentioning
confidence: 83%