2013
DOI: 10.1049/iet-rpg.2012.0283
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex methods to answer the need for improved understanding and modelling of tip‐loss factors

Abstract: Standard blade element momentum (BEM) codes use Prandtl's tip-loss correction which relies on simplified vortex theory under the assumption of optimal operating condition and no wake expansion. The various tip-loss functions found in the literature are listed. A simple comparison between them shows important differences in Annual Energy Production which reveal a large uncertainty in current BEM-based computations. A new tip-loss correction for implementation in BEM codes has been developed using a lifting-line… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Investigations have been performed to improve this model or to create alternatives to this classical correction, based on higher fidelity methods. A data base of tip‐loss corrections was elaborated by Branlard et al using a lifting‐line code and aimed at replacing the Glauert tip‐loss factor in an adapted BEM theory. Schmitz and Maniaci added a simple modification to the classical tip‐loss correction that led to improved BEM prediction at the blade tip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Investigations have been performed to improve this model or to create alternatives to this classical correction, based on higher fidelity methods. A data base of tip‐loss corrections was elaborated by Branlard et al using a lifting‐line code and aimed at replacing the Glauert tip‐loss factor in an adapted BEM theory. Schmitz and Maniaci added a simple modification to the classical tip‐loss correction that led to improved BEM prediction at the blade tip.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is better highlighted by comparing the computed tip‐loss factor in AD‐C‐EV to ones extracted from the VPM simulations (Figure ). The methodology of Branlard et al is used to express the normal and the tangential tip‐loss factors in the VPM approach fa=⟨⟩aθaB2emand2emfa=⟨⟩aθaB, where ⟨⟩.θ represents the azimuthal average. a B and aB are extracted from the VPM blade velocities, a B =1− u n , B / U ∞ and a ′ B = u θ , B /Ω r , while averaged induction factors are obtained in the same way but by using the azimuthally averaged velocity field at the rotor position.…”
Section: The Joukowksy Rotormentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations