2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.1321264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex morphologies on reaccelerated interfaces: Visualization, quantification and modeling of one- and two-mode compressible and incompressible environments

Abstract: We examine the vortex dynamics and interfacial evolution of “reacceleration” and “reshock” for single interface density-stratified fluid (Richtmyer–Meshkov) environments. In the former case, we simulate, visualize, and quantify the parameter range of the free falling tank laboratory experiment of J. Jacobs and C. F. Niederhaus, where the impulsive subsequent acceleration of the interface occurs after several rolls from the initial impulsive acceleration. We interpret the rapid onset of chaotic motion in the ro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This mechanism reminds us of the mixing enhancement resulting from reshock of an interface, where opposite sign vorticity are generated by the oppositely directed acceleration. 30 A similar sketch arises when considering slow-fast Richtmyer-Meshkov environments.…”
Section: Vorticity and Circulation: Vavd And Density Gradient Intementioning
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This mechanism reminds us of the mixing enhancement resulting from reshock of an interface, where opposite sign vorticity are generated by the oppositely directed acceleration. 30 A similar sketch arises when considering slow-fast Richtmyer-Meshkov environments.…”
Section: Vorticity and Circulation: Vavd And Density Gradient Intementioning
confidence: 83%
“…9, we see that the two lowest A* curves are nested, whereas the largest A* curve oscillates strongly and settles down to a near-steady value which is lower than that for A*ϭ0.635. These large A* phenomena are most likely due to waves in Soon after the shock passage, the fluid motion becomes nearly incompressible as demonstrated by Kotelnikov et al 30 and Meiron and Meloon. 31 The evolution of the vorticity in Eq.…”
Section: Vorticity and Circulation: Vavd And Density Gradient Intementioning
confidence: 87%
“…This equation and the vortex method (Krasny 1987;Kotelnikov et al 2000;Sohn 2004;Matsuoka & Nishihara 2006a) enable us to calculate the roll-up of the interface. The velocity of the interface (x, y) = (X (b, t), Y (b, t)) is given as (Baker et al 1982;Matsuoka & Nishihara 2006a)…”
Section: (C) Arbitrary Amplitude Theory In Planar Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As in the case of experiments, the quantitative data obtained from these simulations were mainly limited to the consideration of perturbation amplitude growth. Numerical studies of the reshocked single-mode impulsive Richtmyer-Meshkov instability experiment of Jacobs, Jones, and Niederhaus 20,21 were performed by Kotelnikov and Zabusky 22 and Kotelnikov, Ray, and Zabusky 23 using the vortex-in-cell method and the contour advection semi-Lagrangian method ͑n.b., the Jacobs et al 24 and Rightley et al 25 Mach 1.2 experiment with reshock was also simulated using a Godunov method 23 ͒. Kremeyer et al 26 used a fifth-order WENO method to simulate the Richtmyer-Meshkov instability in a shock tube containing gases with different initial transverse density profiles to investigate shock splitting and, in particular, the role of shock bowing and vorticity dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%