2018
DOI: 10.2514/1.j056399
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex Sheet Strength in the Sears, Küssner, Theodorsen, and Wagner Aerodynamics Problems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
20
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the current formulation, is set equal to the forward velocity, which is the component of the aerofoil's velocity in the negative direction. Although recent research efforts (Xia & Mohseni 2017; Epps & Greeley 2018; Epps & Roesler 2018; Taha & Rezaei 2019) have provided updates to the Kutta condition at the trailing edge, the current formulation, which is based on the approach of Katz and Plotkin (Katz & Plotkin 2000), assumes zero vortex-sheet strength at the trailing edge, and implicitly enforces the Kutta condition by imposing a zero vortex strength at each time step at the trailing edge. The Fourier coefficients are determined using the instantaneous local downwash on the aerofoil due to all bound and shed vorticity by enforcing the boundary condition that the flow must remain tangential to the aerofoil surface: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the current formulation, is set equal to the forward velocity, which is the component of the aerofoil's velocity in the negative direction. Although recent research efforts (Xia & Mohseni 2017; Epps & Greeley 2018; Epps & Roesler 2018; Taha & Rezaei 2019) have provided updates to the Kutta condition at the trailing edge, the current formulation, which is based on the approach of Katz and Plotkin (Katz & Plotkin 2000), assumes zero vortex-sheet strength at the trailing edge, and implicitly enforces the Kutta condition by imposing a zero vortex strength at each time step at the trailing edge. The Fourier coefficients are determined using the instantaneous local downwash on the aerofoil due to all bound and shed vorticity by enforcing the boundary condition that the flow must remain tangential to the aerofoil surface: …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although inherently limited in applicability [9,10], explicit airload expressions and theoretical solutions grant a clear overview of the underlying phenomena and offer rigor-ous validation as well as fundamental insights for both educational and practical scopes in both academic and industrial activities, with a convenient trade-off between reliability and affordability [11][12][13]. Focusing on two-dimensional, incompressible, potential flow without loss of generality for the fundamental purpose of this conceptual work, the unsteady aerodynamic model is first reviewed by adopting a vorticity-based approach [14,15], showing its formal equivalence with Thodorsen's and Wagner's models [16,17]. All previously mentioned approximations for the aerofoil's airload are hence systematically derived by successive simplifications of physical effects and mathematical terms within a unified approach, ranging from the more complex unsteady aerodynamics to the more straightforward steady aerodynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Expressing these vorticity components from Epps & Roesler (2018) in terms of the chord-wise transformation variable θ, we have γ n = 2 sin θ W 3qc cos θ −α c 4 (cos θ + cos 2θ) (3.13)…”
Section: Theodorsen's Theory Of Unsteady Aerofoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first two wake coefficients may be evaluated analytically (Epps & Roesler 2018) as 3.19) while the remaining terms must be calculated numerically. In the equations above, K n (ik) is the modified Bessel function of the second kind of order n.…”
Section: Theodorsen's Theory Of Unsteady Aerofoilmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation