2013
DOI: 10.1088/0953-2048/26/6/065001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortex states inde factomesoscopic Mo80Ge20pentagon plates

Abstract: We present direct observations of vortex configurations in Mo 80 Ge 20 pentagonal plates using a scanning SQUID microscope. The vortex distribution tends to adapt to one of five symmetric axes in a pentagon, as expected from the sample geometry. We found that, for a vorticity of six, the vortices form a two-shell structure in a small pentagon, and a single-shell structure in a larger pentagon. We revealed how the vortex configuration is strongly modified by the presence of a pinning site at the center of the p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The interplay between the intervortex interaction and the confinement results in unique vortex states, different from the Abrikosov-vortex lattice in bulk superconductors. These include vortex polygons, 3 concentric vortex shells, 4,5 and vortex fusion, [6][7][8][9] which have been directly observed in imaging experiments on small superconducting discs, 10,11 squares, 12,13 , triangles, 14,15 pentagons, 16 and others. [17][18][19] In recent years there has been renewed interest in vortices trapped in small superconductors as one of the control sources for non-equilibrium excess quasiparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The interplay between the intervortex interaction and the confinement results in unique vortex states, different from the Abrikosov-vortex lattice in bulk superconductors. These include vortex polygons, 3 concentric vortex shells, 4,5 and vortex fusion, [6][7][8][9] which have been directly observed in imaging experiments on small superconducting discs, 10,11 squares, 12,13 , triangles, 14,15 pentagons, 16 and others. [17][18][19] In recent years there has been renewed interest in vortices trapped in small superconductors as one of the control sources for non-equilibrium excess quasiparticles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issue of vortex shells would be interesting when vortices are confined in polygonal small superconductors like triangle [8,9,10], square [11,12] and pentagonal shaped dots [13]. These polygonal dots have discrete, natural symmetries that coincide or compete with the configurational symmetry of vortex polygons, depending on vorticity L. In triangle dots, vortices intrinsically form a triangular cluster of which symmetry is commensurate with that of the triangle geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scanning SQUID microscopy is considered as a useful tool for mapping a local magnetic field by scanning a pick-up coil connected to a SQUID readout circuit. The SQUID devices are useful in various fields such as magnetics, electronics, biology, spintronics, security analysis, agriculture, information technology, communication, and physics [3,4,5]. A conventional scanning SQUID microscope can observe the distribution of local magnetic field by scanning a single coil which is able to sense a magnetic field only along the Z direction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%