2006
DOI: 10.1063/1.2221353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortical source-sink flow against a wall: The initial value problem and exact steady states

Abstract: Fluid of uniform vorticity is expelled from a line source against a wall. An exact analytical solution is obtained for the nonlinear problem determining the final steady state. Sufficiently close to the source, the flow is irrotational and isotropic, turning on the vortical scale Q∕ω (for area flux Q and vorticity ω) to travel along the wall to the right (for ω>0). The flow is linearly stable with perturbations propagating unattenuated along the interface between vortical and irrotational fluid. Fully n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The injected momentum flux is negative and the current turns upstream as in the vorticity-dominated solutions of Johnson & McDonald (2006). Southwick et al (2017) discuss these effects in greater detail showing explicitly for steady hydraulic solutions that the flux of momentum from the source exactly balances the increase of downstream momentum in the current and how this result and its extension to quasi-geostrophic flows helps resolve the momentum paradox of Pichevin & Nof (1997) and Nof (2005).…”
Section: Hydraulic Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The injected momentum flux is negative and the current turns upstream as in the vorticity-dominated solutions of Johnson & McDonald (2006). Southwick et al (2017) discuss these effects in greater detail showing explicitly for steady hydraulic solutions that the flux of momentum from the source exactly balances the increase of downstream momentum in the current and how this result and its extension to quasi-geostrophic flows helps resolve the momentum paradox of Pichevin & Nof (1997) and Nof (2005).…”
Section: Hydraulic Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For negative PVa outflows the terminal speed of the downstream leading edge is the speed of the rarefaction at the wall and so follows from substituting Z c = 1 into (4.11) yielding, once again, u e = 1/a, precisely the speed, downstream from the source, of √ 2, as in the vorticity-dominated limit (Johnson & McDonald 2006). The solid line in figure 10(b) shows this upstream terminal speed, which is small compared to the downstream KW flow speed when vortex effects are weak (a 2) but exceeds the KW flow speed for strong vortex effects (a 2).…”
Section: Terminal Speeds Of the Leading Edges Of The Anomaliesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations