2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628381
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vortices in stratified protoplanetary disks

Abstract: Context. Large-scale vortices could play a key role in the evolution of protoplanetary disks, particularly in the dead-zone where no turbulence associated with magnetic field is expected. Their possible formation by the subcritical baroclinic instability is a complex issue because of the vertical structure of the disk and the elliptical instability. Aims. In 2D disks the baroclinic instability is studied as a function of the thermal transfer efficiency. In three-dimensional disks we explore the importance of r… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This value is remarkably consistent with our results (Table 1), particularly if we take into account a compaction scenario where the primordial material was even weaker. Our results therefore tend to favor a formation of comets by pebble accretion in a region of higher concentration of particles such as vortices (Johansen et al 2014;Barge & Sommeria 1995;Blum et al 2014), which implies a gentle formation process by accretion at low velocity, on the order of 1 m s −1 or lower. In contrast, the hierarchical accretion model (Weidenschilling 2004) with velocities up to 50 m s −1 for particles larger than 1 m, and the collisional scenario between two large bodies of tens of km or more (Davis & Farinella 1997) with an internal compression by gravity larger than 10 kPa, although not excluded, are less favored.…”
Section: Constraining the Origin Of 67pmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…This value is remarkably consistent with our results (Table 1), particularly if we take into account a compaction scenario where the primordial material was even weaker. Our results therefore tend to favor a formation of comets by pebble accretion in a region of higher concentration of particles such as vortices (Johansen et al 2014;Barge & Sommeria 1995;Blum et al 2014), which implies a gentle formation process by accretion at low velocity, on the order of 1 m s −1 or lower. In contrast, the hierarchical accretion model (Weidenschilling 2004) with velocities up to 50 m s −1 for particles larger than 1 m, and the collisional scenario between two large bodies of tens of km or more (Davis & Farinella 1997) with an internal compression by gravity larger than 10 kPa, although not excluded, are less favored.…”
Section: Constraining the Origin Of 67pmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Regarding the baroclinic perturbations, although they are known to produce vortical instabilities in protoplanetary disks (Klahr & Bodenheimer 2003;Petersen et al 2007a,b;Lesur & Papaloizou 2010;Raettig et al 2013;Barge et al 2016), they have been rarely considered in relation to hot protoplanets. For example, Owen & Kollmeier (2017) claim that that hot protoplanets can excite large-scale baroclinic vortices but we do not identify any of those in our simulations.…”
Section: Relation To Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The code was previously used to study the formation of vortices by the Rossby-Wave or the baroclinic instability (Richard et al 2013;Barge et al 2016), and also to study the coupled evolution of gas and dust (Inaba & Barge 2006). This code, which uses the finite volume method and was first presented in Inaba et al (2005) can maintain high accuracy over large integration periods (Surville & Barge 2015;Surville et al 2016).…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%