Vorwort

Principled resistance and future of the ECtHR

“…1 The possibility for each participating state to continue to withdraw from the obligations assumed during the ratification of the treaty is an important form of dissent which entails the relative legal and political consequences. Obviously, as can be understood in international practice, withdrawal is the last resort not frequent enough and questionable (Hill, 1982;Vahlas, 2005;Priollaud, Siritzky, 2005;Piris, 2006;Louis, 2006;Athanassiou, 2009;Hofmeister, 2010;De Bùrca & Weiler, 2011;Craig & De Bùrca, 2011;Tatham, 2012;Nicolaides, 2013;Auvret-Finck, 2013;Bosse-Platière & Rapoport, 2014;Emmert & Petrovi, 2014;Loth & Paun, 2014;Caddous, 2015;Grosclaude, 2015;Barnard, 2016;Hillion, 2016;Łazowski, 2016;Čapeta, 2016;Craig, 2016;Eeckhout & Frantziou, 2017;Nicolaides & Roy, 2017;Haguenau-Moizard & Mestre, 2017;Closa, 2017;Lord, 2017;Mangas Martìn, 2018;Schütze & Tridimas, 2018;Hatje et al, 2018;Aloupi et al, 2019;Schwarze et al, 2019;Huysmans, 2019;Kellerbauer et al, 2019;Berry et al, 2019;Bradford, 2020;Fitzmaurice & Merkouris, 2020) 2 especially when it comes to matters of human rights and economic relations ...…”