Vorwort:

Müller-Karpe, Andreas; Rieken, Elisabeth; Sommerfeld, Walter

doi:10.2307/j.ctvc2rmpm.3

Cited by 8 publications

(13 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…1051 Müller-Karpe later corrected his dating to Ha A1. 1052 Mozsolics also suggested the earlier dating of Ha A1 for the find from Rinyaszentkirály, as did Hansen on the basis of the axe in the associated deposit of Stetten/Teiritzberg, and P. König for Boljanić, 1053 whereas Johannowsky dated them as early as Bz D. Concerning the associated deposit of Nadap (Bz D/Ha A1), the deposition date during Ha A1 is already well-established. 1054 The greaves of Type Lengyeltóti from Boljanić, 1055 Slavonski Brod, 1056 Poljanci IV 1057 and Veliko Nabrđe, are generally dated to period II, following Vinski-Gasparini.…”

Section: Chronologymentioning

confidence: 74%

“…575 In his recent discussion of the origin of European crested helmets, Brandherm dates helmets of Type Biebesheim to no later than Ha A. 576 Müller-Karpe narrows the chronological frame down to the early phase of the late Urnfield period, with their first appearance in Bz D, 577 while A. Coffyn assigns the helmets to the very end of Bronze final I or the beginning of Bronze final II (Ha A1). 578…”

Section: Research Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Protecting the Body in War and Combat

Mödlinger¹

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Boundless thanks goes to the English-language editor of my manuscript, Steven Matthews. He saved the reader not only from questionable 'Denglish', but also, apart from such delightful stylistic pearls such as helmets floating in space ('30cm above the ground'), and other questionable things as a 'small cow plastic', significantly reduced many inconsistencies (I am afraid that some, nevertheless, remain). For all remaining oddities, errors, and assumptions I am the only one to blame.Last, but not least, the most special thanks go to my daughter Helene for the time I spent writing and not with her.

show abstract

Section: Chronologymentioning

confidence: 74%

Section: Research Historymentioning

confidence: 99%

Protecting the Body in War and Combat

Mödlinger¹

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Tatsächlich wurde er jedoch in einem anderen Raum gefunden, s. Pernicka 1997, 255. 154 Müller-Karpe 1994, 22. 155 Zwicker 1980Yalçın 2003, 533, Abb.…”

Section: Tepecikunclassified

Çukuriçi Höyük 3

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This monograph focuses on the interdisciplinary examination of the metallurgical finds from Çukuriçi Höyük (western Turkey), which date from the Late Chalcolithic to Early Bronze Age (c. 3300–2700 BC). The exceptionally rich ensemble includes almost all parts of the technological chain (chaîne opératoire), from tools, casting moulds, furnaces, ores, raw metal and ingots to finished products, tin bronzes and precious metals (Au, Ag). On the one hand, these remains were classified according to archaeological typological criteria, and on the other hand, they were analysed using various scientific methods (metallography, SEM-EDS, ED-XRF and lead isotope analysis). The arsenical copper production can be regarded as an outstanding result of the research; to date, there are only very few Bronze Age sites where evidence for this is present. The produced As-copper was fed into the East Aegean-West Anatolian networks. Precious metal and weapons additionally demonstrate that not only everyday objects but also prestige goods were produced. The fact that some of these pieces are locally made of the new – until then unknown – material tin bronze underlines the "gateway function" of the tell on the western Turkish coast. The silver-copper alloy produced on site additionally demonstrates that the metallurgists were integrated into wide-ranging technology and communication networks of Early Bronze Age elites. The concluding holistic discussion of these results makes it possible to gain an in-depth picture of metal craftsmanship and its embedding in Early Bronze Age exchange and social systems.

show abstract

“…This group, including a flat axe, a slotted spearhead, three daggers, three chisels and a toggle-pin was among the contents of Room 56, which was dated to the EBA III and destroyed by a violent fire 41 . Room 55 from the same layer was later identified by Müller-Karpe as a possible metal-workshop, based on the find of a sandstone mould and some other finds related to metal production (metal gouge, hematite weight and a probable tuyère) 42 .…”

Section: An Overview Of the Previous Research On The Metalworking Actmentioning

confidence: 99%

Metals from Caves: The Significance of the Metal Finds from Karain and Kılıçini Caves Within the Context of the Later Prehistory of the Antalya Region

Keskin¹

2019

CEDRUS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A number of caves located on the skirts of Mount Katran near Antalya display a unique character, harbouring extensive traces of human habitation from the Holocene era (from the Neolithic through to the Early Bronze Age) following the Palaeolithic period. In this respect, the Karain and Kılıçini caves are among such sites in this region that provide important archaeological data. The metal artefacts from both caves provide new insights on the use of caves during the Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Age, as well as casting a light on regional and interregional interactions. By approaching the available data from two different perspectives, this study aims to place this metal inventory in its correct regional and interregional context through typological and functional analyses; on the other hand, based upon the metal artefacts and further archaeological evidence, it also intends to provide some insights into the dynamics lying behind the intensive, yet unusual occupation of the caves during these particular periods. Öz: Antalya yakınlarında Katran Dağı eteklerinde yer alan bir dizi mağara Paleolitik dönemi takiben, Holosen çağ boyunca da (Neolitik-Erken Tunç Çağı arası) yoğun kullanım izleri barındırmaları açısından ünik bir karakter sergilemektedir. Bu bölgede yer alan Karain ve Kılıçini mağaraları da bu bağlamda önemli veriler sunan yerleşimler arasındadır. Her iki mağarada ele geçen metal eserler Geç Kalkolitik ve Erken Tunç Çağı boyunca mağaraların kullanımlarına yeni bakış açıları kazandırmak yanında, bölgesel ve bölgelerarası ilişkilere de ışık tutmaktadır. Mevcut verileri iki farklı açıdan değerlendirmeyi amaçlayan bu çalışma, bir yandan metal eserleri tipolojik ve fonksiyonel açıdan ele alarak bölgesel ve bölgelerarası ilişkiler açısından değerlendirmeyi ve bölgenin metal endüstrisi içinde doğru bağlama oturtmayı; diğer yandan yine bu eserler ve diğer arkeolojik kanıtlar ışığında, mağaraların bu dönemlerde, pek de alışıldık olmayan biçimde, yoğun bir şekilde tercih edilmesinin ardında yatan nedenlere dair bazı bakış açıları sunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

show abstract

Vorwort:

Cited by 8 publications

References 0 publications

Protecting the Body in War and Combat

Protecting the Body in War and Combat

Çukuriçi Höyük 3

Metals from Caves: The Significance of the Metal Finds from Karain and Kılıçini Caves Within the Context of the Later Prehistory of the Antalya Region

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About