2008
DOI: 10.1080/17457280701858631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voter Turnout in the Indian States: An Empirical Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…By 2009, participation in elections had stabilised, with a turnout rate of 58.8%, in line with rates from any of the elections over the previous 20 years (Kumar :48; Palshikar and Kumar :5412). In the state of Tamil Nadu, however, where this study is located, rates are even higher, with a mean voter turnout of 64.4% for 1951–2004 (Diwakar :83). Furthermore, as Figure shows, Tamil Nadu has seen significant increases in electoral participation, which in recent years have exceeded all‐India levels (Kumar :48, Economic and Political Weekly :138, Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By 2009, participation in elections had stabilised, with a turnout rate of 58.8%, in line with rates from any of the elections over the previous 20 years (Kumar :48; Palshikar and Kumar :5412). In the state of Tamil Nadu, however, where this study is located, rates are even higher, with a mean voter turnout of 64.4% for 1951–2004 (Diwakar :83). Furthermore, as Figure shows, Tamil Nadu has seen significant increases in electoral participation, which in recent years have exceeded all‐India levels (Kumar :48, Economic and Political Weekly :138, Figure ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Despite the substantial insights they offer, election studies have been critiqued for what Lama‐Rewal (:2) calls their focus “on the ‘mechanics’ more than on the ‘substance’ of representative democracy”. Studies of elections and voting tend to explore the processes, trends and patterns of the electoral process rather than taking voting as an entry into understanding democracy and citizenship itself (Chandra ; Diwakar ; Kumar ). Ethnographic approaches, by contrast, are well suited to the study of the meanings people attach to voting as a key aspect of democracy as well as to an exploration of voting as a window onto culturally specific understandings of rights, duties and citizenship (Banerjee :1556; Lama‐Rewal :4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an election, reputation of political parties but also that of their leaders will influence the voter behavior (Worcestor et al, 2005) and India has been witnessing an increased voter turnout over time Diwakar (, ) The reputation of an organization and that of its leader are believed to be linked in causality, implying that managing and presenting the leader are valid ways to manage the reputation of the organization (Gaines‐Ross, 2003; Laurence, 2004). Personality image coupled with the foundational ideological principles of corrupt free governance of AAP triggered mass acceptance.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, studying the 2002 and 2006 Hungarian parliamentary elections, Simonovits (2012) notes that a 5% increase in the margin of victory in the first round results in a 1-percentage point decrease in turnout when controlling for other relevant variables in the turnout function. Finally, in a study on subnational-level turnout in India, Diwakar (2008) finds that a 1-percentage point increase in the difference of the vote share between the winner and the second-placed party leads to a 10.7% decrease in turnout.…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 97%