2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44668-0_31
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting-Merging: An Ensemble Method for Clustering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
43
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Community matching (consensus clustering) can be done in a hard or a soft way. Hard community matching can be performed by selecting the best matching pair of communities one by one, avoiding conflict with already selected pairs [10,11] or using greedy algorithms like CLUMPP [20]. Soft community matching can be done so as to minimize the distance between the two matrices [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Community matching (consensus clustering) can be done in a hard or a soft way. Hard community matching can be performed by selecting the best matching pair of communities one by one, avoiding conflict with already selected pairs [10,11] or using greedy algorithms like CLUMPP [20]. Soft community matching can be done so as to minimize the distance between the two matrices [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, there has been an emergent interest in studying cluster ensembles to enhance the quality and robustness of data clustering and to accommodate a wider variety of data types and clusters structures [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. Some of the research have relied on using a co-association matrix as a voting medium for finding the combined partitioning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After overall consistent re-labeling, voting can be applied to determining cluster membership for each data item. Dimitriadou et al [5] proposed a voting/merging procedure that combines clusterings pair-wise and iteratively. The correspondence problem is solved at each iteration and fuzzy membership decisions are accumulated during the course of merging.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Step 5 of Algorithm 1, D is computed based on (10) and is a very small positive number used to avoid dividing by 0. for h = 1 to r do 4: while convergence criterion of S (h) is not satisfied do 5:…”
Section: Definition 42 Given R Membership Matrices Mmentioning
confidence: 99%