1983
DOI: 10.1177/106591298303600412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voting on School Finances: a Test of Competing Theories

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 14 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the findings from this research suggest that self-interest is critical to explaining individual-level support for school bonds (Tedin, Matland, & Weiher, 2001) but measures of capacity to pay (Lentz, 1999;Theobald & Meier, 2002) and racial considerations and cleavages have also been shown to matter for voter support (Cataldo & Holm, 1983;Tedin et al, 2001). However, in contrast to local school bonds that often seek to raise more capital for a school district, many salient statewide education initiatives address broad policy reforms, targeting, for example, educational programs or school choice options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Some of the findings from this research suggest that self-interest is critical to explaining individual-level support for school bonds (Tedin, Matland, & Weiher, 2001) but measures of capacity to pay (Lentz, 1999;Theobald & Meier, 2002) and racial considerations and cleavages have also been shown to matter for voter support (Cataldo & Holm, 1983;Tedin et al, 2001). However, in contrast to local school bonds that often seek to raise more capital for a school district, many salient statewide education initiatives address broad policy reforms, targeting, for example, educational programs or school choice options.…”
mentioning
confidence: 94%