Proceedings of MELECON '94. Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference
DOI: 10.1109/melcon.1994.381146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vowel and consonant recognition in Turkish using neural networks toward continuous speech recognition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 6 depicts the sensitivity results obtained from the proposed and MFCC features classified by all three classifiers. This table also includes the classification performance of the study in [7] which classifies the Turkish vowels by MFCCs using ANN.…”
Section: Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Table 6 depicts the sensitivity results obtained from the proposed and MFCC features classified by all three classifiers. This table also includes the classification performance of the study in [7] which classifies the Turkish vowels by MFCCs using ANN.…”
Section: Tests and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to evaluate the performance of the SV approach more objectively, a literature search on various vowel classification performances is also carried out. In detail, a brief comparison is given in Table 6 with the results of another study; however, this study also contained Turkish vowels [7] whereas we are keen to look into the success rates of vowel classification in different other languages. On the other hand, it should be pointed out that the indirect comparison here is just to give a rough idea about the performance of the SV approach among other vowel classification results in general.…”
Section: Comparison With Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation