2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-009-0168-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voxel-based reproducibility of T2 relaxation time in patellar cartilage at 1.5 T with a new validated 3D rigid registration algorithm

Abstract: Using a rigid 3D-registration algorithm provides voxel-based T2 reproducibility errors comparable to former, 2D region-based approaches, thus opening the possibility of voxel-based monitoring of cartilage degradation in osteoarthritis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Test-retest reproducibility for both global and regional ADC and FA was in the range of previously reported in vivo data (1.5 T and 3.0 T) for T2 (35)(36)(37)(38) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Test-retest reproducibility for both global and regional ADC and FA was in the range of previously reported in vivo data (1.5 T and 3.0 T) for T2 (35)(36)(37)(38) …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous evaluations of cartilage T2 reproducibility have been limited to single-site single-vendor studies of the patella (16,36,37). In our study, cartilage T2 measurements generally had good to high reproducibility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For comparison, the ranges of CV for different proton‐based MRI techniques for assessing OA in cartilage are cartilage thickness: 2.1–8.3% (28, 29); cartilage volume: 1–7.5% (28, 29); dGEMRIC: 4.7–12.9% (30); T2 mapping: 3–7% for global measurements, 6–29% for regional measurements (31–33); T1ρ mapping: 7–19% (33); diffusion tensor imaging: apparent diffusion coefficient 8.1%, fractional anisotropy 9.7% (34).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%