2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.07.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Voxel based versus region of interest analysis in diffusion tensor imaging of neurodevelopment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
170
3
5

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
14
170
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Advantages and disadvantages of both procedures have been mentioned throughout this review, and there has been much debate about the use of voxel-based or ROI-based approaches (Good et al, 2001). Various studies have compared both methods (Furutani et al, 2005;Giuliani, Calhoun, Pearlson, Francis, & Buchanan, 2005;Kanaan et al, 2006;Kubicki et al, 2002;Snook et al, 2007;Suzuki et al, 2005;Tapp et al, 2006;Testa et al, 2004), finding, on the whole, similar results for both methods but some advantages for voxel-based over ROI-based analysis. Although VBM can overlook small differences (Saxe, Moran, Scholz, & Gabrieli, 2006), the ROI approach limits the chances of coming up with new, unexpected findings (Friston & Henson, 2006) making it difficult to expand and generalize the body of knowledge.…”
Section: Methodological Concerns and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Advantages and disadvantages of both procedures have been mentioned throughout this review, and there has been much debate about the use of voxel-based or ROI-based approaches (Good et al, 2001). Various studies have compared both methods (Furutani et al, 2005;Giuliani, Calhoun, Pearlson, Francis, & Buchanan, 2005;Kanaan et al, 2006;Kubicki et al, 2002;Snook et al, 2007;Suzuki et al, 2005;Tapp et al, 2006;Testa et al, 2004), finding, on the whole, similar results for both methods but some advantages for voxel-based over ROI-based analysis. Although VBM can overlook small differences (Saxe, Moran, Scholz, & Gabrieli, 2006), the ROI approach limits the chances of coming up with new, unexpected findings (Friston & Henson, 2006) making it difficult to expand and generalize the body of knowledge.…”
Section: Methodological Concerns and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, there is no such heterogeneity of methods in WM studies because -with the exception of only two studies that used a TOI approach, which suffers from the same shortcomings as the ROI approach (Furutani, Harada, Minato, Morita, & Nishitani, 2005;Kanaan et al, 2006;Snook, Plewes, & Beaulieu, 2007;Tapp et al, 2006) -the remaining studies follow a standardized method implemented in FSL to perform the TBSS approach on diffusion-derived measures. However, it is important take into account that the use of data acquired from different scanners (1.5T or 3.0T) and using different parameters for the acquisition of the images (see tables 1 and 2 for details of the different studies reviewed here) can produce important differences in the quality of the images across studies and also influence variability in the results.…”
Section: Methodological Concerns and Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These parameters where then applied to the FA and diffusivity images, resulting in accurate alignment of the CST in all subjects. For voxelwise analysis, a smoothing kernel of 8mm was chosen according to recommendations by Snook et al (2007). However, smoothing was omitted for ROI and slicewise analysis to avoid pollution by signal from neighbouring non-white matter voxels.…”
Section: Dti Data Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DTI metrics have identified significant effects of adult aging that are now well described in regional white matter (for review, . Typically, with advancing age anisotropy declines and diffusivity increases more in anterior than posterior brain regions, whether measured with a region-ofinterest approach (Head et al, 2004;Madden et al, 2004;O'Sullivan et al, 2001;Pfefferbaum et al, 2005;Pfefferbaum et al, 2006;Pfefferbaum and Sullivan, 2003;Pfefferbaum et al, 2000;Salat et al, 2005;Sullivan et al, 2001), voxel-based analysis (Grieve et al, 2007;Kochunov et al, 2007;Snook et al, 2007), or quantitative fiber tracking (Pfefferbaum et al, 2007;Sullivan et al, , 2008. As observed postmortem, a predilection of age-related loss occurs for thin, unmyelinated fibers, which are in greatest abundance in the frontal lobes (Aboitiz et al, 1996;Bartzokis, 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%